Free Newsletters

   All InfoWorld Newsletters
Database Underground | Sean McCown » Microsoft will NEVER be a Leading Software Vendor!

October 17, 2006 | Comments: (0)

Microsoft will NEVER be a Leading Software Vendor!

So, will MS ever be a world-leading software vendor? The answer is absolutely NOT...never ever never will they ever be able to maintain anything other than a perfunctory standing in the software community.

Why? It's simple. Because they hold such a loose dress code. It sounds like the two things aren't related(success and dress), but they are. They must be, because that's what we're told constantly by almost every company out there.

"You can't wear jeans because it's unprofessional."
"If you dress like a professional, you'll act like a professional."

Almost every company out there has a business or business casual dress code, but come on now... every one of them allows for casual friday. So what you're telling me is that since the clothes make the man, then I'm allowed to screw up the DBs and just play around on fridays, because I'm not dressed like a professional. Of course I'm not allowed to do that. So what's with the dress code then? Well, we get customers at this site, and we want to make a good impression. We want our people to look like professionals. OK, so customers are banned from the building on friday? No, we just explain to them that it's casual friday and they're usually good with that. So, why can't you just explain to them that it's casual wednesday, or better yet, we have a casual office?

My big problem with these dress codes is that they're just so arbitrary. Who says that a tie is better than a t-shirt for working in all day? I've had managers call me down for wearing shirts without a collar. But, I explained to him, Tim over there is wearing a polo shirt with simple logo on it, and I'm wearing a very nice silk sweater, and you're telling me that he's dressed nicer than I am because he's got a collar? YES, that's exactly what I'm telling you. But what about Jane over there? Her dress doesn't have a collar. But women don't count. They don't have to wear collars. So women really are smarter than men because we need collars to be smart, and women can do it without them? Wow, I've got a lot to learn about the differences between men and women.

So apparently, if you can't be good enough at your job to wear a tie to prove it, then you can at least know enough about SQL to wear anything with a collar. So dressing well isn't good enough... it has to be a specific uniform. Hey, like in fast food! Why don't we get companies to issue us uniforms like at McDonald's or a private school? That way we can all look alike and it would take casual fridays and everything else right out of the equation. Because women aren't held to these dress code standards, just men.

Last week I was in the shower pondering a problem at work. I thought on it for a few minutes, and just couldn't think of a way to fix my problem. That's when it hit me. I called my wife to bring me a tie. I slipped it on the the answer came to me almost instantly. Sometimes I just don't know where my head is. How could I forget something so basic?

Now, back to MS. Haven't any of you ever wondered why MS is always delaying their releases? Why did it take so long to get Yukon out the door? Why are Vista and Longhorn suffering from delays? Why was WinFS taken out of the OS? Why doesn't Exchange use SQL on the backend? That's right people... dress code. If they would only require their developers to wear ties, they could start being a real heavy hitter as a software vendor. As it stands, they don't have one single product that anyone uses... Office, what a joke... SQL Server, don't make me laugh... Exchange, might as well be a paper airplane with a note written on it... Windows, what is it, like on one desktop anymore?

So you can see what having a loose dress code has done for MS. They could have been worth something, but they insist on letting those hippies run around on campus in their shorts, trying to code without the proper coding attire. It's a pathetic waste. And with policies like that it's no wonder Gates can barely afford to feed the country he bought. Those poor people only get to eat steak and lobster once a day. Now how sad is that?

OK, all of this sarcasm has been very fun, but I'll get serious for a minute. You know, dress codes are necessary to a degree but only in certain areas, and they have nothing to do with how professional you are or even act.

Dress codes should be used to keep women from putting too much on display. That much is certain. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for women dressing so show off their assets, but it just doesn't belong in the workplace.

Now, I'm not being sexist here. I've never seen an issue come up at work where a guy was talked about because he showed off too much of his body, or wore his shirt too low. However, for the sake of fairness, I'll go ahead and say that nobody should be dressing in a manner to attract a mate. How's that?

Other than that, I can't imagine that anything else would be taboo.

And like I said, it's completely arbitrary. If it weren't, then different companies wouldn't have different dress codes. If a company like MS can become one of the largest software vendors on the planet and still maintain a casual dress code, then there must be something to it. And MS doesn't have some special of screening exam to test for people who can do their jobs without ties. They're pulling from the same work force everyone else is. And I can't think of a single instance... anywhere... where someone has messed something up at work because he wasn't dressed in business attire.

It's just ridiculous.

Posted by Sean McCown on October 17, 2006 09:32 AM


RATE THIS ARTICLE:





 

  •  
  • COMMENTS




But then...their code is sloppy, insecure and often bug ridden ;-)

Posted by: Simon Ablett at October 18, 2006 05:02 AM

Dress codes seem to be cyclic. I've worked where it was a tie every day, then casual Friday's came along, and now I work for a company that promotes business casual. Obviously there are more important things to address in the work environment but this often gets missed. I mean what if you could wear anything (or nothing) and your pay and benefits stunk? If Microsoft fosters creativity and supports its employees then the casual dress is an added benefit and likely improves versus detracts from productivity.
I suspect some day we'll be back to ties and suits, I dread that day though.

Posted by: David Pepper at October 18, 2006 11:30 AM

I'm 100% with you on this. I remember the days when my company was small and pretty much anything less than provacative was acceptable. We're still biz casual m-th with jeans and shorts ok on friday, but it just starts every day off wrong when you get up to go to work and have to take into account what you are "allowed" to wear or not.

Another example of "the man" trying to keep us down.

Posted by: bamrick at October 18, 2006 12:06 PM

Why do you suppose that throughout history all over the world, the people in the military all wear uniforms? (This IS a serious, albeit tricky, question, so suppress your inclination to give a thoughtless snide reply.)

Posted by: E. Douglas Jensen at October 18, 2006 12:18 PM

Pay people for products that do the job not how they dress. Years ago (15 or more) our offices were visited by the "IT Pros". All dressed in wing tip shoes, blue blazers, white shirts and ties. They made the sales pitch. We bought. Two years later the company was out of business. So much for dressing up. But they looked good.

Posted by: lee marpet at October 18, 2006 04:12 PM

I don't think attire has any more to do with M'Soft's success than what they serve in the company cafeteria, whether there's a foosball table in the break room, or the percentage match in the employee's 401(k)... but taken as an aggregate, and adding a results-oriented culture with rewards to match, hiring the best and brightest with salary to match... I think they may be on to something.

As a contrast, my company has a "business casual" workplace, but coats and ties are de rigeur when visiting clients. this isn't "the man" telling me to do anything since it's my company (but, as the commercial says "you.... _are_ the man?") It is however, a recognition that for most of us, attitude goes on with attire, and that in the sales environment, like prefers like, so by dressing as our clients do, we convey an empathy and understaning of their environment.

Posted by: Old school at October 18, 2006 04:25 PM

Why do people wear uniforms? Regimentation. Is regimentation appropriate in a civilian workplace, where both men and women work and are under stress to balance family/private lives with workplace responsibilities?

Sometimes yes, sometimes no. To require it in situations where competent people are in short supply, such as information workers, can be appropriate if the workforce is "on display" as part of the company marketing and the employees are compensated above the norm in return. If not, then it is foolish. And yes, a tie is a piece of clothing meant to imply business, in other words it is part of the "business man's uniform". Other than that use, a tie is a ridiculous piece of clothing.

Posted by: Randy Unruh at October 18, 2006 06:51 PM

I always have found the-client-is-visiting-so-we-must-dress-up dynamic interesting. Why would you want to lie to your client about the type of office you keep? I wonder how much business has been lost because of the duplicity inherent in this practice?

Posted by: Arthur Poulos at October 18, 2006 09:44 PM

Surely this article is a joke? Shouldn't this have appeared on April 1st? You have obviously never worked in a programming shop. Taking a piece of cloth, tieing it around your neck and then tieing a knot. This is professional, this is logical????? Do you want people who are stupid enough to do this, trying to write software?? Not to mention, no good programmer would work in an environment like that so you will have bunch of nice dressers who couldn't get jobs anywhere else. Microsoft not a leading software vendor?? I am not a big fan of Microsoft, but from a business standpoint, have you ever looked at how profit they make as a percentage of revenue?

Posted by: jim at October 19, 2006 07:14 AM

To respond to E. Douglas Jensen about military uniforms...

So they know which people to kill. (wonderfully snide answer that is very accurate!) There are a number of useful side effects. A standard uniform helps remove individualism and is one part of creating a conforming attitude that is necessary for an army. "Don't think! Follow orders!"

I'm not sure how this truly relates to dress codes in a creativity based business environment.

I realize that no one can ever see anything about another person except what they can see. This includes your actions. If you are working in a "short contact" environment such as sales you must do something very visual to give the immediate impression that you are credible and what the situation requires.

In "long contact" situations the only real important thing is that your visual appearance isn't a distraction.

Posted by: Wayne Colony at October 19, 2006 07:25 AM

Microsoft is in my backyard and I know several people that work there. Too many employees are unprofessional and have a poor worth ethic.
Microsoft is a deadline driven company, not a quality driven company. They may be the leading software vendor, but they lost the quality somewhere along the way.

Microsoft as a whole is forward thinking and has definitely made valuable contributions. So I don’t want to make it sound like I am Microsoft bashing.
My point is that I am witnessing a scary trend in their trenches.

Is the dress code to blame? No. I just don’t believe Microsoft should be used as an example of the success of a casual dress code.

Microsoft bashing aside....
Professional employees will remain professional regardless of the dress code providing there is good leadership at the helm.

Even so, how you dress does say alot about who you are and affects how people react to you. Therefore a dress code should never be taken lightly.

Posted by: Rusty at October 19, 2006 11:27 AM

Hahahaha, very funny. I needed a good laugh. I can't believe how many folks never made it to "OK, all of this sarcasm has been very fun".

Posted by: Doug in Seattle at October 19, 2006 12:08 PM

It only adds to the absurdity when business casual is heralded as the right thing to do but casual days are used as a REWARD. For example, my company will give casual days when we reach a major company milestone or everyone in our department fills out the response cards for a charity pledge drive.

Posted by: Shawn at October 20, 2006 06:05 AM

Technology White Papers

 

InfoWorld Technology Marketplace

» Technology White Papers Library

Technology White Papers by Topic

Technology White Papers E-mail Alert

Find out when the latest white paper is available:
 
 
» BUY A LINK NOW

Sponsored Technology Links