Free Newsletters

   All InfoWorld Newsletters
Enterprise Desktop | Randall C. Kennedy » It's Back to the Future with IBM Lotus Symphony!

September 19, 2007 | Comments: (0) | TrackBacks: (250)

It's Back to the Future with IBM Lotus Symphony!

“I wanna go back, and do it all over…”

Yes, it’s time for another episode of “flashback” with the enterprise desktop dude! It’s circa 1987, and Eddie Money is tearing up the charts with hits like “Take Me Home Tonight” and “I Wanna Go Back” (see lyrics snippet above). Meanwhile, a company called Lotus Development is working on the latest iteration of its flagship applications suite – Lotus Symphony – which competes head to head with similarly integrated offerings from Microsoft, Borland and Ashton-Tate. Your intrepid host watches from the sidelines as he slaps together PC/AT systems while working as a part-time hardware techie after school (and passing the time by dreaming up ways to score with that cute blonde chick from home room).

Fast forward to 1995 and it’s the height of the OS war between Microsoft and IBM. Your intrepid host, fresh from briefing IBM senior management at a retreat in Rye Brooke, NY, wanders by the demo kiosk for something called “StarOffice” (Look, everyone, it’s from Germany!). The uber-geek manning the kiosk proceeds to fire-up a fresh OS/2-for-PowerPC port of the new “Office-killer” which proceeds to crash violently. Ever in the moment, your intrepid host quickly distracts Messrs. Lou Gerstner and Jerry York (IBM’s then CEO and CFO, respectively), refocusing their attention on the delightful demo at the next kiosk titled “How to crash Windows 95 in under 5 seconds” (hint: it involves debug.com and disabled interrupts).

Leap ahead another dozen years (for those taking notes that means today) and we find ourselves trapped in what I like to call a “marketecture causality loop.” IBM, now the owner Lotus Development’s IP, announces the release of “IBM Lotus Symphony,” which is in fact nothing more than a repackaging of OpenOffice which, in turn, is the descendent of the very same StarOffice program we saw splattered across an IBM-branded CRT over a decade earlier (and which still has the bad habit of barfing-up the occasional coding hairball). Talk about rehashing old bits! Meanwhile, your intrepid host is now married with children and passes the days contemplating his expanding girth and diminishing mental acuity.

“Hey, Eddie: It’s me, the enterprise desktop dude! I wanna go back, man! Take me home tonight…to 1987!”

Posted by Randall Kennedy on September 19, 2007 01:00 AM


RATE THIS ARTICLE:





 

  •  
  • COMMENTS




Are you sure it's a repackaging of OpenOffice? I gave it a try yesterday. It requires Eclipse to run. I don't know that OpenOffice needs Eclipse, does it? Also, the interface is quite different from the OpenOffice applications on my Ubuntu machine. I don't think IBM went such a great length to re-package OpenOffice as Eclipse plugins.

Regards,
Tung Tran

Posted by: Tung Tran at September 19, 2007 07:11 AM

Tung,

Well it's certainly based on the OpenOffice.org code base. They may have tweaked it a bit, however, the point of the blog entry was to show the link between the various product developments that ultimately lead to this situation. It was a fun little romp through my own personal memory lane, nothing more/nothing less. :-)

RCK

Posted by: Randall C. Kennedy at September 19, 2007 08:13 AM

Good article! Yes, it sure was eerie, hearing this name from the past brought up as a current product.

I even briefly wondered if they had actually resurrected the code from the 1980's somehow. Hey, with all the talk about virtual machines these days, weirder things have happened.

What is especially odd is that, not only is IBM muddying the product brand names, but Symphony was not a commercial success. Indeed, the entire integrated software category tanked. Going with a name that is associated with a failed product is just peculiar.

Does anyone remember FrameWork? There was another integrated product sold in those days too, but I can't remember it's name.

Posted by: Brian at September 19, 2007 12:46 PM

The ill-fated OS/2 for PowerPC didn't ship until December 1995, only to be withdrawn shortly after, after the desktop PowerPC effort was abandoned and OS/2 PPC was an OS without machines to run on. Then, IBM refocused 100% behind the x86 code base, and finally released OS/2 Warp 4.0 in November 1996.

StarOffice today (and OpenOffice) bears little resemblance to what was StarOffice from Stardivision those days (StarOffice 4.x from Stardivision, v5.0, 5.1 and 5.2 from Sun had an integrated desktop of its own, a calendar, and more, which Sun quickly dropped after OpenOffice 1.0 and StarOffice 6.0 were released).

Surely the crash you saw was because OS/2 for PowerPC was in beta, more than due to a lack of quality of the Stardivision code base.

I ran StarOffice 4.0 beta 2 for OS/2 Warp 3.0 (x86, not PowerPC) for YEARS (since the English version wasn't marketed outside of Germany), without major stability problems.

Trying to say that today's OpenOffice (2.3.0 just released) or IBM's derivative is some old recooking of old Stardivision code is totally silly, it would be like saying that Windows Vista is a refrying of old Windows 95 code...

FC

Posted by: Fernando Cassia at September 20, 2007 05:27 PM

What surprised me is that IBM choose to name it after an old Lotus product that was a complete failure and labeled one of the 10 worst software products by John Dvorak (PC Magazine, 8/16/04). Have the MBAs at IBM heard of the concept of "research?" Personally, I like OOo and use it exclusively for documents. I uninstalled MS Office on my PC months ago and have not looked back. OOo is free and gives me everything I need to create complex documents and spreadsheets. I especially like reading about the latest security holes with MS Office and knowing that I can ignore them! Unless someone needs MS Office for a solution integrated with other software, I think a user would be crazy to spend hundreds of dollars when they can get a excellent product for free. I hope IBM's entry will give OOo and its cousins the exposure and publicity they deserve!

Posted by: Robert at September 21, 2007 12:37 PM

Technology White Papers

 

InfoWorld Technology Marketplace

» Technology White Papers Library

Technology White Papers by Topic

Technology White Papers E-mail Alert

Find out when the latest white paper is available:
 
 
» BUY A LINK NOW

Sponsored Technology Links