- Greed, politics, and CanSecWest
- Windows Search 4.0 preview: first impressions
- Is Microsoft artificially delaying XP SP3?
- The six month *nix itch: How should I scratch it?
- You can never have too many cores
- Was Vista DOA?
- Windows "Workstation" 2008 results lead to backlash from Vista zealots
- Windows "Workstation" 2008: One week later
- Windows "Workstation" 2008 Clobbers Vista in Benchmark Testing
- Microsoft owns up to Vista's flaws (sort of)
January 17, 2008 | Comments: (0)
Windows 7 goes "RTM"
It's true. Windows 7 was just released ... to manufacturers.
Of course, this differs from that other "RTM" -- released to manufacturing -- but hey, it sounds good!
Seriously, it appears that Microsoft has just released what is being dubbed "Milestone 1" of the Windows 7 code base to its key vendor partners. And while this doesn't mean we'll be booting Windows 7 anytime soon (current projections put the real RTM in the second half of 2009), it does show that a Windows 7 product currently exists and is "alive and kicking" on some hardware, somewhere outside of Microsoft (albeit behind several layers of locked doors and mean looking security guard-types).
What this also shows is that we're likely a scant 12-14 months away from a beta program for Windows 7 -- and perhaps as little as 18 months away from a really usable product. Given that most IT shops are only now starting to consider their Windows Vista migration plans, the not-so-distant arrival of "Version 7" gives further credence to the idea that these shops could actually skip Vista altogether. Add to this the generally tepid response to "Windows 6" -- plus efforts like the "Save XP" campaign here at InfoWorld -- and it seems clear that the XP option will remain viable for some time.
Frankly, this is a good thing. Microsoft needs to be shown that, at least in enterprise computing circles, they can't simply force-feed their customer base a new version. Release software that provides no compelling reason for us to upgrade and we'll ignore it. Period. However, lest we become overconfident, it's important to remember that this may very well be a one-time deal. It's unlikely that IT shops will choose to fall more than one generation behind the state of the art, so skipping Windows 7 is not really an option.
Here's hoping that Microsoft gets smart and makes this next version more appealing to its enterprise base -- and that Ubuntu and others keep improving Linux so we always have a viable alternative to keep the 800lb gorilla honest!
Posted by Randall Kennedy on January 17, 2008 08:15 AM
RATE THIS ARTICLE:
-
- COMMENTS
Precisely. The objective is not to damage or destroy Windows, or Microsoft. It's to keep them honest, and listening to their customers. Well, at least as much as one can expect a very large organization to do so.
The best comparison I can think of recently was Intel. Intel got pretty far off track, ramming Itanium and Rambus-RAM down customer's throats. I think they stuck with the aging Pentium-4 architecture partly as a pressure tactic against their customers ("hey, if you want faster, we got these shiny Itaniums over here...").
Active competition is one of the best customer protection mechanisms there is.
Now please tell me they are doing this version properly and dumping support for 32 bit? Having 32 bit Vista is one of the silliest thing MS has done in a long time sort of like 16 bit OS/2.
Posted by: Peter at January 18, 2008 01:59 PMTOP STORIES
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
- Remote Access: Maintain Security and Decrease the Burden on IT
- Beyond AntiVirus: Symantec Endpoint Protection
- What Every Enterprise Needs to Know About VDI
- Help Simplify Virtualization
- Solution for Open Virtualization Provides Server Consolidation
- A Guide to Rich Internet Application (RIA) Security
