<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">

<channel>
<title>Fatal Exception | Neil McAllister</title>
<link>http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/?source=rss</link>
<description>Insight and analysis on the changing world of software development, from the desktop to the Web and beyond.</description>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator>feedback&#64;fatalexception&#46;org</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-09T03:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.17" />
<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<sy:updateBase>2000-01-01T12:00+00:00</sy:updateBase>

<item>
<title>Microsoft&apos;s Touchless SDK pulls a mouse out of thin air</title>
<link>http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/10/microsofts_touc.html?source=rss</link>
<description>
New code libraries allow Windows apps to use Webcams as pointing devices &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/10/microsofts_touc.html?source=rss&quot;&gt; READ MORE&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; 
</description>
<guid>http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/10/microsofts_touc.html</guid>
<dc:subject>User experience</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Neil McAllister</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-09T03:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Should computer programming be mandatory for U.S. students?</title>
<link>http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/10/mandatory_compu.html?source=rss</link>
<description>
Core computer literacy will be essential in the global job market, so maybe it&apos;s time to start looking at programming as a baseline skill and not as a differentiator &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/10/mandatory_compu.html?source=rss&quot;&gt; READ MORE&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; 
</description>
<guid>http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/10/mandatory_compu.html</guid>
<dc:subject>Education</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Neil McAllister</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-02T03:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>SDK shoot-out: Android vs. iPhone</title>
<link>http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/09/sdk_shootout_an.html?source=rss</link>
<description>
Apple and Google differ along familiar lines with their smartphone development kits &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/09/sdk_shootout_an.html?source=rss&quot;&gt; READ MORE&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; 
</description>
<guid>http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/09/sdk_shootout_an.html</guid>
<dc:subject>Mobile Apps</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Neil McAllister</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-25T03:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>VMware proposes a new kind of OS</title>
<link>http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/09/vmware_proposes.html?source=rss</link>
<description>
An operating system for the virtualized datacenter could signal a sea change in software development &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/09/vmware_proposes.html?source=rss&quot;&gt; READ MORE&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; 
</description>
<guid>http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/09/vmware_proposes.html</guid>
<dc:subject>VMware</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Neil McAllister</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-18T03:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Building Google Chrome: A first look</title>
<link>http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/09/building_google.html?source=rss</link>
<description>
Google&apos;s open source browser has much to offer prospective hackers (provided they use Windows) &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/09/building_google.html?source=rss&quot;&gt; READ MORE&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; 
</description>
<guid>http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/09/building_google.html</guid>
<dc:subject>Browsers</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Neil McAllister</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-11T03:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Google Chrome: A developer&apos;s perspective</title>
<link>http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/09/google_chrome_a_1.html?source=rss</link>
<description>
Google&apos;s new Chrome browser sets a new standard for the Web as an application platform &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/09/google_chrome_a_1.html?source=rss&quot;&gt; READ MORE&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; 
</description>
<guid>http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/09/google_chrome_a_1.html</guid>
<dc:subject>Google</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Neil McAllister</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-04T03:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bitten by the Red Hat Perl bug</title>
<link>http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/08/bitten_by_the_r.html?source=rss</link>
<description>
Is it realistic to expect stem-to-stern application platform support from any one vendor? &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/08/bitten_by_the_r.html?source=rss&quot;&gt; READ MORE&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; 
</description>
<guid>http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/08/bitten_by_the_r.html</guid>
<dc:subject>Software Quality</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Neil McAllister</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-28T00:30:21-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Was JavaScript a mistake?</title>
<link>http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/08/was_javascript.html?source=rss</link>
<description>
Standardizing on a single language puts too many eggs in the browser&apos;s basket. &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/08/was_javascript.html?source=rss&quot;&gt; READ MORE&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; 
</description>
<guid>http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/08/was_javascript.html</guid>
<dc:subject>Web applications</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Neil McAllister</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-21T03:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Empowering the software auteurs</title>
<link>http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/08/empowering_the.html?source=rss</link>
<description>
Can Mozilla Labs harness the creative spirit to breathe new life into open source software? &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/08/empowering_the.html?source=rss&quot;&gt; READ MORE&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; 
</description>
<guid>http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/08/empowering_the.html</guid>
<dc:subject>User experience</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Neil McAllister</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-14T03:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>California&apos;s COBOL conundrum</title>
<link>http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/08/californias_leg.html?source=rss</link>
<description>
Maintenance fix or complete overhaul? A state&apos;s budget hangs in the balance. &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/08/californias_leg.html?source=rss&quot;&gt; READ MORE&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; 
</description>
<guid>http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/08/californias_leg.html</guid>
<dc:subject>Application Development</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Neil McAllister</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-07T03:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Cloud computing on whose terms?</title>
<link>http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/07/cloud_computing.html?source=rss</link>
<description>
As appealing as cloud computing may be, remember that the vendors hold the strings. &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/07/cloud_computing.html?source=rss&quot;&gt; READ MORE&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; 
</description>
<guid>http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/07/cloud_computing.html</guid>
<dc:subject>Cloud Computing</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Neil McAllister</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-31T03:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Is there really such a thing as &quot;programming IQ&quot;?</title>
<link>http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/07/is_there_really.html?source=rss</link>
<description>
A new standard test or a silly time-waster? You be the judge. &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/07/is_there_really.html?source=rss&quot;&gt; READ MORE&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; 
</description>
<guid>http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/07/is_there_really.html</guid>
<dc:subject>Just For Fun</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Neil McAllister</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28T18:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Battle for the Cloud: Google vs. Microsoft</title>
<link>http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/07/battle_for_the.html?source=rss</link>
<description>
Independent developers must choose between two radically different approaches to cloud computing. &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/07/battle_for_the.html?source=rss&quot;&gt; READ MORE&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; 
</description>
<guid>http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/07/battle_for_the.html</guid>
<dc:subject>Cloud Computing</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Neil McAllister</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-24T03:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>A biological approach to security</title>
<link>http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/07/a_biological_ap.html?source=rss</link>
<description>
Nervous marmots and masturbating monkeys: We can learn a lot about how to address software vulnerabilities by studying how animals react to threats in the wild.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/07/a_biological_ap.html?source=rss&quot;&gt; READ MORE&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; 
</description>
<guid>http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/07/a_biological_ap.html</guid>
<dc:subject>Security</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Neil McAllister</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-17T03:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Web development skills crisis</title>
<link>http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/07/the_web_develop.html?source=rss</link>
<description>
The proliferation of Web technologies has been much on my mind lately. Last week, I talked about the continuum of Web development tools, ranging from traditional browser-based technologies all the way to applications deployed as binary executables. The interesting thing is that all of these tools are designed to achieve similar goals. So which do you use? I&apos;m not trying to start a flame war. Some developers will swear by Flash, while others will choose AJAX, and even within those groups there will be individuals whose preferences are even more rigidly defined. The question is, how do developers maintain their skill sets -- and, by extension, their value in the marketplace -- when the so-called state of the art seems to change on an almost-daily basis?
 &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/07/the_web_develop.html?source=rss&quot;&gt; READ MORE&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; 
</description>
<guid>http://weblog.infoworld.com/fatalexception/archives/2008/07/the_web_develop.html</guid>
<dc:subject>Web applications</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Neil McAllister</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-10T03:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>
