- Whether to mention a pregnancy in a job interview
- A possible meeting protocol
- What are an end-user's responsibilities?
- Another take on opening PCs, or not
- Getting some process going
- Selling a more open environment to management
- Running an effective meeting
- Licensing rules for virtual machines
- The ROI of metrics
- Legal challenges to virtual machines
July 27, 2007 | Comments: (0)
When standards are "Not Invented Here"
Dear Bob ...
Continuing the discussion about IT standards and what to do when people ignore them (see "Roving e-mail," Keep the Joint Running, 7/2/2007): What about the employee who admits the corporate e-mail (or phone system, or desktop, or accounting system, or whatever) does everything their "chosen," but non-standard method does, but still won't change?
In my opinion, this employee has a significant "Not Invented Here" syndrome. I have come close to terminating this employee numerous times, but keep trying to find some management method to redeem this wayward child….who is a year older than me!
The company has been carrying the division that Mr. N.I.H. is supposed to be "developing" for over 4 years. Business sense says, cut the anchor and let the rest of the ship sail. I have been too much of an optimist for too long. Perhaps I am not a talented enough captain to direct a two masted ship.
- Sailing away
Dear Cap'n ...
You could, I suppose, try sarcasm: "Would you like an answering machine to attach to your phone so you don't have to use the corporate voicemail system, too?"
If the employee works for you, say, "Since you can't give me a reason for using your non-standard alternative, it's time for you to decide whether or not you want to be an employee. The company provides a perfectly satisfactory solution for what you want to do. Your decision to do something different, just because you feel like it, isn't acceptable. So if you want to be an employee, it's time to start acting like one. If you don't, tell me now."
If the employee doesn't work for you, you might consider approaching his/her manager. Present the situation, explain that you don't want to be the standards police and would prefer to handle things informally if possible.
Or, if there really isn't any negative impact on anyone other than the employee from making the non-standard choices, take advantage of your natural right to ignore the situation entirely.
- Bob
PS: From your description, failing to follow the company standard is the smallest issue you have with this guy. If I were you (from your account it does appear you're his boss), I'd find his complete failure to produce results to be the more interesting subject for discussion.
Powered by ScribeFire.
Posted by Bob Lewis on July 27, 2007 12:56 PM
RATE THIS ARTICLE:
-

- COMMENTS
Mr. Lewis is right on the mark with this. While it is important to be open to different working styles, tools, and approaches (particularly with regard to technology), it is the employer who makes the final call and sets the rules of the house. We all make decisions as to if our employer's rules are reasonable and we can work within them. If not, it is time to find another organization with values more in line with our own.
Posted by: Jeff Helm at July 28, 2007 02:54 PMThis isn't a technical problem, it's a business problem.
If you ran an office with a typical 8 to 5 work day, Monday through Friday, what would you tell someone who wants to work 12 to 9? Or ten hours four days a week?
What would you tell someone who wants to telecommute?
In all three cases -- hours, location and tools -- you ask yourself two simple questions: is the employee equally or more productive using the alternative, and does his use of the alternative cause any additional overhead for anyone else?
If productivity goes down, and the letter above said there's no clear productivity of any kind, you don't even need to ask about cost.
The only tough call is if the employee is productive with the alternative, but causes more work for other employees. Then you have to ask yourself, is the increased productivity worth more than the added cost?
Posted by: Drew Kime at July 31, 2007 08:34 AMMy editor of choice for programming is WordStar. It works for me. Trying to force me off it would get a very negative reaction.
My use of it, though, does not have interactions with other things. It creates ASCII files. Because of no interactions, my preference should rule.
Where there are interactions though, it is more than my preference that rules. For example, if there is a coding standard, then I should have to follow it.
To make it unanimous, it is management's prerogative to manage . My version of response to the employee is, "It doesn't matter to me what you decide to use . The person who will be doing this job is the person who will be using the company email [et al]" . I'll be interested to know what you decide" .
Posted by: Larry Sadler at August 1, 2007 05:22 PMThere are other concerns with someone using an unsanctioned email system other than productivity and cost, which are risk related. For example, is the other email system secure, does anyone else have access to it? Does the other system require periodic password changes? In my business, as in the White House, communications is strictly regulated and all correspondence must be archived for future search, so using Gmail or Yahoo! would put the company at risk.
Posted by: Al Vyssotsky at August 1, 2007 06:51 PM|
Three books. Three ways to change the world, your life, or at least Bob Lewis' bank account. Leading IT: The Toughest Job in the World distills the world of IT leadership into eight learnable skills and gives you concrete, practical techniques for each one of them. Bare Bones Project Management: What you can't not do makes project management manageable, even for first-time project managers with no formal training in the discipline. ManagementSpeak: What managers say/What they mean … well, it won't help your career, and won't make you a better manager. Mostly, it will make you chuckle, guffaw, and maybe even chortle. Make friends - it's the perfect gift for anyone who has ever suffered through one of those meetings. Order your copies today! |
TOP STORIES
HP buys EDS for $13.9 billionCorporate software spending slows
MS targets smartphone market
SOA Software buys LogicLibrary
Phishers scamming IRS rebates
Sun to clarify JavaFX plan
MS' dev tool service packs
Developers' role shifting
MS: SP3 reboots OEMs' fault
Apple: iPhone out of stock
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

- Virtualization: A Step by Step Approach to Success
- Dialing up Agility with Business Transformation
- 5 Things You Need to Know About Storage Virtualization

- Is your smaller organization ready for High Availability?
- Is system maintenance doing more harm than good?
- Virtual Test Lab Automation: Manage development infrastructure





