Free Newsletters

   All InfoWorld Newsletters
Advice Line | Bob Lewis » Where are the box's boundaries

July 08, 2007 | Comments: (0)

Where are the box's boundaries



Dear Bob ...

I'm responding to your recent Keep the Joint Running, "Iacocca's alliterative leadership list," (6/18/2007) where you discuss the importance of "out-of-the-box" thinking.

I believe the value of "new ideas" or (groan) "thinking outside the box" is highly over-rated. There's always a notion and even a conceit that says that what an organization needs is new ideas, specifically my new ideas. That's what politicians campaign on. The difficulty is not coming up with new ideas. I would wager in any organization that you could get 5 - 10 people from anywhere in the organization and they could come up with 10 - 20 valid new ideas if they sat down and discussed it for an hour. The problem is not the dearth of ideas; it's the planning, organizing and execution of ideas.

Most of the ideas I have heard are high level "concepts" that have value and you can't argue with. Let's streamline this operation, someone might say. Who could argue? But assembling a team of capable people to analyze and actually do the planning is hard to do. Then making a plan and obtaining the resources to support the plan and the "streamlining" can be damn near impossible.

Good idea, yes. But just try doing it without staff, without funding and doing it on some ridiculous schedule that’s pulled from the sky. I blame at least part of this on previous cut-backs which largely eliminated true staff people who didn't have production responsibilities but looked ahead, tried to do the planning necessary and the strategic thinking. Staff people are among the first to go during all the cut-back of "fat". Now operational managers have to do a lot of staff or administrative duties in addition to keeping the place running. Then someone comes up with a good idea and they have to spend more time trying to analyze data and identify roadblocks, obstacles, or whatever to make operations move even faster. Ironically, this usually increases their work load.

In summary, good ideas are plentiful; it's the planning, organizing and execution that’s the trick.

- Executioner


Dear Executioner ...

Vague goals are commonplace. Truly innovative ideas are another matter. "Streamline this operation" is hardly thinking outside the box, after all. "Instead of setting reorder points, restocking levels and estimating delivery time we could just let our selected vendor monitor our inventory and keep it within contractually established boundaries," is a different matter.

Thinking outside the box is a matter of spotting the hidden assumptions that are built into a solution for reasons that once were important but no longer are, and figuring out what you can do now that they no longer constrain you.

At least, that's how I define the phrase.

We are, by the way, in complete agreement that compared to the challenges of execution, developing useful ideas is relatively easy. In my estimation, a healthy organization should generate at least an order of magnitude more good ideas than it's in a position to pursue. It's the organizations that have shut off the spigot that concern me.

- Bob

Powered by ScribeFire.

Posted by Bob Lewis on July 8, 2007 04:12 PM


RATE THIS ARTICLE:





 

  •  
  • COMMENTS




See, there's a problem.

"Instead of setting reorder points, restocking levels and estimating delivery time we could just let our selected vendor monitor our inventory and keep it within contractually established boundaries,"

Not necessarily outside the box thinking because you have to do all those things anyway to set contractually established boundaries. So, where's the new idea?

Agree with Executioner, ideas are there aplenty if they are encouraged and listened to. The difficult part is the execution detail and political games that are played.

Posted by: Daremo at July 11, 2007 11:12 AM

Here's one of my favorite out-of-the-box tests:

In one room you have 3 on/off switches. In another room you have a single light bulb connected to one of the switches. You can't see the bulb from the switch room. You can set the switches all you want, then go into the other room (once) and determine which switch controls the light.

Posted by: John in Colorado at July 11, 2007 02:01 PM

"In one room you have 3 on/off switches. In another room you have a single light bulb connected to one of the switches. You can't see the bulb from the switch room. You can set the switches all you want, then go into the other room (once) and determine which switch controls the light."

So, John, what's the right answer?

Mine is that you should turn on switch number 1 and leave it on for about a minute. Then turn off switch number 1 and turn on swith number 2. Leave switch number 3 off. Now go into the lightbulb room - If the bulb is on, switch number 2 is connected. If the bulb is off, touch the bulb. If it is hot, switch number 1 is connected. If the bulb is off but cold, switch number 3 is active.

Posted by: Rich at July 12, 2007 09:09 AM

Daremo, the difference is that you'd be making your vendor do the research.

John, turn on the first switch and leave it on for a minute. Turn it off and turn on the second switch. Go into the room. If the light is on, the second switch controls it. If it's off, feel the bulb. If it's still warm, the first switch controls it. Otherwise the third switch controls it. (Not that this assumes the light was not already on when you started.)

Posted by: Drew Kime at July 12, 2007 09:20 AM

So, John, what is the answer?

Posted by: Dan at July 12, 2007 09:27 AM

A fun logic puzzle. Of course the much easier way is to get your assistant to stand in the room and tell you when the bulb comes on.

Posted by: Sue M at July 13, 2007 10:55 AM

Rich's answer is obviously correct. I've heard "proofs" from logical people that you can't differentiate among 3 choices with only 1 sample. Realizing that a bulb has more that one dynamic attribute is tough when you're caught in "the box"

Posted by: John in Colorado at July 18, 2007 07:03 AM

Bob

My context of thinking outside the box is to always remember that when someone thinks "outside the box" they are then thinking "inside" some other box .

Posted by: Larry Sadler at July 23, 2007 02:54 PM

Three books. Three ways to change the world, your life, or at least Bob Lewis' bank account.

Leading IT: The Toughest Job in the World distills the world of IT leadership into eight learnable skills and gives you concrete, practical techniques for each one of them.

Bare Bones Project Management: What you can't not do makes project management manageable, even for first-time project managers with no formal training in the discipline.

ManagementSpeak: What managers say/What they mean … well, it won't help your career, and won't make you a better manager. Mostly, it will make you chuckle, guffaw, and maybe even chortle. Make friends - it's the perfect gift for anyone who has ever suffered through one of those meetings.

Order your copies today!





Technology White Papers

 

InfoWorld Technology Marketplace

» Technology White Papers Library

Technology White Papers by Topic

Technology White Papers E-mail Alert

Find out when the latest white paper is available:
 
 
» BUY A LINK NOW

Sponsored Technology Links