- Whether to mention a pregnancy in a job interview
- A possible meeting protocol
- What are an end-user's responsibilities?
- Another take on opening PCs, or not
- Getting some process going
- Selling a more open environment to management
- Running an effective meeting
- Licensing rules for virtual machines
- The ROI of metrics
- Legal challenges to virtual machines
September 11, 2007 | Comments: (0)
Government by the numbers: 3, 1, 3, 4
Dear Bob ...
What are the tricks for applying the 3,1,3,4 ("Secretive solutions," Keep the Joint Running, 9/3/2007) to government entities? I just made the switch from private industries to county organization, and it’s been a real ‘eye-opener’, in every sense of the word… Any help/tips/support there? If not, where do I go? Would you please give me some pointers?
- Adapting
Dear Adaptable ...
I don't see why any of this would need to be modified. This is how you go about organizing your thoughts and plans, and how you go about leading your team.
What you probably need to adjust are your expectations. That isn't because you now work for a government entity. It's because you work for a different entity.
Government entities have a reputation for stodginess - for being slow, bureaucratic, and hard to change. I haven't done enough work in the public sector to be able to judge whether they are, on the average, any slower, more bureaucratic or harder to change than businesses or non-profits. (I'm certainly not going to base my judgment on "everybody knows" arguments, either.)
What I do know is that businesses run the gamut from nimble to glacial. I'd expect government entities to do the same.
This all matters because having a three-year vision, one-year strategy, three month goals and four week plan still makes sense for you. What doesn't make sense is to assume an unrealistic pace of change and try to drive your organization harder than it is capable of changing … or harder than the larger organization in which it is embedded will allow it to change.
Your guideline: Your goals should be aggressive, but not hallucinatory.
- Bob
Powered by ScribeFire.
Posted by Bob Lewis on September 11, 2007 05:27 AM
RATE THIS ARTICLE:
-
- COMMENTS
I read in Time mag that the Dept of Homeland Security consists of 22 Agenices that report to 88 different Congressional Subcommittees. I work for USDA and we get pulled this way and that way and get passed all sorts of unfunded mandates which we juggle until figuring out which ones will matter and which ones won't.
I would submit that while your approach to mgmt should be similar in private or public arenas, that the winds blow far more capriciously from Congress than they do from the free market.
|
Three books. Three ways to change the world, your life, or at least Bob Lewis' bank account. Leading IT: The Toughest Job in the World distills the world of IT leadership into eight learnable skills and gives you concrete, practical techniques for each one of them. Bare Bones Project Management: What you can't not do makes project management manageable, even for first-time project managers with no formal training in the discipline. ManagementSpeak: What managers say/What they mean … well, it won't help your career, and won't make you a better manager. Mostly, it will make you chuckle, guffaw, and maybe even chortle. Make friends - it's the perfect gift for anyone who has ever suffered through one of those meetings. Order your copies today! |
TOP STORIES
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
- Virtualization: A Step by Step Approach to Success
- Dialing up Agility with Business Transformation
- 5 Things You Need to Know About Storage Virtualization
- Is your smaller organization ready for High Availability?
- Is system maintenance doing more harm than good?
- Virtual Test Lab Automation: Manage development infrastructure
