- Whether to mention a pregnancy in a job interview
- A possible meeting protocol
- What are an end-user's responsibilities?
- Another take on opening PCs, or not
- Getting some process going
- Selling a more open environment to management
- Running an effective meeting
- Licensing rules for virtual machines
- The ROI of metrics
- Legal challenges to virtual machines
September 25, 2007 | Comments: (0)
Spectating the layoffs at Intel
Dear Bob ...Did you catch this news over at Intel yet (link below)? It's about Intel's internal layoff process (called by Intel, 'redeployment'). The blogger I've linked to seems to be a manager that has to use certain criteria to keep or lay off employees and the struggles he/she has to go through to do so. The blogger is unhappy with the process:
http://intelperspective.blogspot.com/2007/09/izit4vsp.html
Here's the original story from InfoWorld's sister pub ComputerWorld:
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9038359&intsrc=hm_list
I thought you might find these scenarios familiar in the sense of how companies make decisions and whether or not the mechanism will do what the company intends. And of course there's the legal aspect.
In any case, the blog seems to be one process laid clear for all to see (Or to let Intel employees that might gripe know what's involved? The blog appears honest enough, but it wouldn't surprise me to see a company soft pedal it's layoffs via a 'candid' blog describing the 'pains' a manager must go through to cut employees).
- Spectator
Dear Spectator ...
I haven't been following the story. If you're looking for my take on it, recognizing that I don't know a thing about the specifics beyond what I just read … well, what the heck - here goes:
Skills-based assessments, assuming Intel means what it says in using the term, ignore performance. It's the exact same mistake many companies make when recruiting - they look at skills before they look at a track record of succeeding at assignments.
When recruiting, one of my guidelines is to avoid hiring anyone who has all of the skills needed for a position. Any applicant who has them all is probably coasting instead of pushing the envelope. I want people who want to push hard, not coast.
Here, the situation is a bit different, but not all that different. Employees who push hard and succeed might be earlier in the skills curve than more senior employees who have more skills but less motivation.
Which isn't to criticize Intel too hard. Quite a few commenters lamented the lack of a voluntary separation package. My opinion, for whatever it's worth, is that any attempt at meritocracy is better than none. If Intel is making a concerted effort to keep its best people, more power to it.
Nothing about massive layoffs is easy. Often, they could have been prevented through more disciplined management earlier on. There are also times when layoffs are nothing more than showboating for Wall Street.
This doesn't appear to be a case of catering to the analysts, and while it's easy to second-guess what Intel should have been doing for the past five years, it now appears to be facing a tough situation in a forthright way.
In the absence of any better ideas, I figure I should give them the benefit of the doubt.
- Bob
Powered by ScribeFire.
Posted by Bob Lewis on September 25, 2007 08:52 PM
RATE THIS ARTICLE:
-

- COMMENTS
Personally, I believe that all layoffs not related to seasonal employment are the result of management failure. Once the process is finished, I wonder how many top managers will still be around.
I also object to the term "layoff" if no recall rights are involved. The workers who can't find other positions in the company are being fired, plain and simple. Let's do away with all the euphemisms.
Posted by: Dave at September 26, 2007 10:34 AMWhat I find eerie is that I work for a small (70 employee) midwestern company, and we have the same workplace conditions I see in the intel blog and the responses. Does this mean that bad management is everywhere? Or does this mean that the best and brightest will inevitably become bitter and disillusioned and demotivated and do well to move on?
Posted by: Sasquatch at September 26, 2007 12:15 PMYou said
"When recruiting, one of my guidelines is to avoid hiring anyone who has all of the skills needed for a position. Any applicant who has them all is probably coasting instead of pushing the envelope."
Maybe I am misunderstanding, but it seems to me that an alternative explanation is that the person with all the skills has been learning, learning, learning at work and on his own.
Sometimes you just see a job that matches what you want to do and have been prepping to do and zam bang zippo, you HAVE all the skills. Be a shame to lose someone who has been looking for your position to arise just because you think he might be a slacker, when he has really just been in constant preparation for just this moment.
I think that Doug Johnson is reading Bob a little too literally. My guess, having been a reader for a while, is that if a resume came across Bob's desk that had all of the requirements, and looked like the gal/guy had been pushing her-/himself, that person would be considered a good candidate for the job. On the other hand, if a resume came across the desk where the candidate had all of the requirements for a while, and no new accomplishments and no recent evidence of any pushing the limits, that person would no longer be considered.
IMHO, When looking for good employees, we want folks that keep pushing themselves towards doing/learning more. It's checking out the candidate's growth curve over time, rather than simply the job requirements at this static point in time.
Posted by: Sam Jackendoff at September 27, 2007 05:43 PM|
Three books. Three ways to change the world, your life, or at least Bob Lewis' bank account. Leading IT: The Toughest Job in the World distills the world of IT leadership into eight learnable skills and gives you concrete, practical techniques for each one of them. Bare Bones Project Management: What you can't not do makes project management manageable, even for first-time project managers with no formal training in the discipline. ManagementSpeak: What managers say/What they mean … well, it won't help your career, and won't make you a better manager. Mostly, it will make you chuckle, guffaw, and maybe even chortle. Make friends - it's the perfect gift for anyone who has ever suffered through one of those meetings. Order your copies today! |
TOP STORIES
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

- Virtualization: A Step by Step Approach to Success
- Dialing up Agility with Business Transformation
- 5 Things You Need to Know About Storage Virtualization

- Is your smaller organization ready for High Availability?
- Is system maintenance doing more harm than good?
- Virtual Test Lab Automation: Manage development infrastructure





