- Whether to mention a pregnancy in a job interview
- A possible meeting protocol
- What are an end-user's responsibilities?
- Another take on opening PCs, or not
- Getting some process going
- Selling a more open environment to management
- Running an effective meeting
- Licensing rules for virtual machines
- The ROI of metrics
- Legal challenges to virtual machines
September 17, 2007 | Comments: (0)
When to fire an irreplaceable employee, and when not to
Dear Bob ...
I'm writing to comment on "The causes of greatness," (Keep the Joint Running, 9/10/2007) in which you criticize the idea that you should immediately fire any employee who is irreplaceable.
There are two reasons why an employee becomes irreplaceable. The critical difference is tools versus keys. You keep the one with the tool and try to find another. You throw away the one with the keys.
Tools: This employee has a set of tools in their "belt" that no one else in the organization has - thus making them the one to turn to when things are broken that their tool set fits.
If you have a Unix box and one person that knows Unix, they are the one you turn to. You don't fire that employee if you want to keep your Unix box running.
The solution to the problem - because either the employee will realize you can't get rid of them and will start demanding things you can't deliver, or they don't and leave (usually suddenly) for reasons of health or family - is you bring in another employee that they can train. Expecting an existing employee with a full workload to "learn the tool" in their "spare" time isn't feasible. Having the employee (with the tool) train a series of summer interns (or their equivalent) is unfair to everyone.
If your management doesn't let you find another employee to work with them, learn from them, and help them; you need to leave.
Keys: This employee is one who hoards knowledge - they realize they have the "keys to the kingdom" and want to be the only person with those keys. If you find yourself bringing in people that have the same (or very similar) technical background and don't appear to be incompetent, but you find them being bored because they have nothing to do; then you fire the one with the "keys" and let the rest of the organization pick up those keys - one key to a person.
- Not Irreplaceable
Dear Fungible (just kidding!) ...
Good analysis. Of course, first you have to get control of the keys. While you're doing this you have to play your cards close to the vest because otherwise the employee with the keys can do a lot to sabotage you.
This is true whether:
- The employee is a developer and the keys are undocumented data designs or software.
- The employee is a middle manager to whom employees have more loyalty than they do to you.
- The employee is in sales and the keys are clients with whom only the sales rep has a personal relationship.
- The employee is a great schmoozer and has a stronger personal relationship with the CEO and board than you do.
- Bob
Powered by ScribeFire.
Posted by Bob Lewis on September 17, 2007 05:31 AM
RATE THIS ARTICLE:
-

- COMMENTS
The person that should immediately be terminated is the managerial individual that allowed the employee to become irreplaceable. Part of the responsibility of any managerial individual is to prevent such a situation from ever arising.
Mark Robinson
Posted by: Mark Robinson at September 19, 2007 10:56 AMOne other issue is who you can trust with the keys. I have had a situation where the company required that one other individual had the system passwords. This person was untrained in how to operate the systems and thought that she knew everything. She would regularly make undocumented changes to "fix a problem" that generally didn't exist creating a problem. Guess who kept getting called on the carpet for not maintaining control over the systems. This was especially true when the other person changed all of the supervisor level passwords to "password" so she could remember them all.
We had the obvious break-in and after a two week recovery that would have taken one week without the help of the "expert" I was fired for not controlling these systems.
So you may want to look at the people who you are insisting that copies of the "keys" be turned over to and see if they are worthy of having the "keys". Also pay attention to which person with the "keys" is a problem. Just because someone is the primary holder of them doesn't mean that they are the one at fault when they are miss used.
Posted by: Ray Stevens at September 20, 2007 06:19 AMI am only talking about the 'irreplaceable' employee with the Keys, not the tools. The problem with teminating the individual that allowed the employee to become irreplaceable is if the 'irreplaceable' employee is not also terminated it makes for a very difficult environment for a new manager to walk into (unless of course the 'irreplaceable' employee gets promoted to the terminated managers position, which I have seen happen!! and creates its own set of impossibilities) The company, from the CEO to shop floor worker (in a manufacturing plant) to the sales clerk (in a retail outlet) needs to be willing and able to help pick up the pieces wherever and however they can so that the 'irreplaceable' employee can be let go and 'be replaced'. It takes sacrifices on everyone's part, but the environment will be much better once the 'irreplaceable' employee is gone.
Posted by: Marcia at September 20, 2007 07:01 AMI suspect "irreplaceable" employees are more common in smaller organizations. Sometimes a small organization can only afford one of a certain kind of employee.
Posted by: Sue M at September 24, 2007 02:28 PMIt's surprisingly easy to replace an "irreplaceable" when s/he gets run over by a herd of water buffalo. Amazing what we can accomplish when there's a gun to our heads...
Posted by: Tom at September 26, 2007 11:48 AM|
Three books. Three ways to change the world, your life, or at least Bob Lewis' bank account. Leading IT: The Toughest Job in the World distills the world of IT leadership into eight learnable skills and gives you concrete, practical techniques for each one of them. Bare Bones Project Management: What you can't not do makes project management manageable, even for first-time project managers with no formal training in the discipline. ManagementSpeak: What managers say/What they mean … well, it won't help your career, and won't make you a better manager. Mostly, it will make you chuckle, guffaw, and maybe even chortle. Make friends - it's the perfect gift for anyone who has ever suffered through one of those meetings. Order your copies today! |
TOP STORIES
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

- Virtualization: A Step by Step Approach to Success
- Dialing up Agility with Business Transformation
- 5 Things You Need to Know About Storage Virtualization

- Is your smaller organization ready for High Availability?
- Is system maintenance doing more harm than good?
- Virtual Test Lab Automation: Manage development infrastructure





