Free Newsletters

   All InfoWorld Newsletters
Open Sources | Rodrigues & Urlocker » Oracle acquisitions: Nefarious or Opportunistic?

February 12, 2006 | Comments: (0)

Oracle acquisitions: Nefarious or Opportunistic?

Back in October when Oracle announced it was acquiring InnoDB I pondered the impact and decided that while irritating, it wasn't that big of a deal for MySQL. I even suggested that MySQL switch the InnoDB functionality to Sleepycat's BerkeleyDB. But now that Oracle is in allegedly in talks to buy Sleepycat as well it adds a new level of complexity.

A few people are starting to make the argument that Oracle is buying up the components of MySQL to put some kind of stranglehold on the non-internal IP. But I think that's merely a by-product of the bigger picture.

By acquiring JBoss and Sleepycat, Oracle automatically positions itself as the owner of two very broadly used products. (NOTE: Since Zend doesn't technically own PHP I can only assume the appeal is to own the developers.) Regardless of revenue, both of these companies are important. I have suggested a number of times that JBoss should be acquired, primarily because I believe a larger parent would allow for a longer run at sustainable revenue. It would also position that larger parent as a serious leader in open source.

As for MySQL, once again, it's a drag this is happening but it's a solvable problem. It's also a validation that they have seriously disrupted the market-especially if Oracle's motive was to take another shot at dismantling the product.

Posted by Dave Rosenberg on February 12, 2006 05:21 PM


RATE THIS ARTICLE:





 

  •  
  • COMMENTS




I am concerned about the influence that Oracle could gain over the open source stack if they are able to acquire both JBoss and Zend, especially if Oracle continues to acquire additional open source companies. I also wonder if they can really assimilate additional acquisitions right now, particularly companies with corporate cultures so heavily influenced by open source culture. I posted a few more details and some additional analysis this morning on my blog.

Posted by: GeekyGirl at February 12, 2006 06:35 PM

Wait a second, time for a reality check. If some large company comes along and embraced the open-source movement somehow that's nefarious?

And why would anyone be concerned that a company that has it's DB and app's just about in every large company in the world, would want to pay attention to a segment of the industry that was begging for attention 10 years ago?

I guess I am not following the logic here.

First, of all just about every thing Oracle builds today is build on open-standards (except for the DB which is their special sauce...)- see java, php, web services. Just look at their middleware line.

Second, large companies acquiring smaller companies do not stifle innovation in the open-source movement. The movement is free from corporate control- that's the whole point, you can do whatever you want to devote your time to. Further, why would a vendor want to stifle and alienate a healthy and vibrant developer community? In many cases they are the same people that could be recommending commerical Orace products on other projects where an open-source DB or app server may not fit the project scope.

I think this is a good thing and will result in acceptance of qaulity open-source software in larger companies.

Posted by: Leo at February 15, 2006 12:12 AM

Microsoft Mini Spotlight
  • Get Started
  • Port 25 Blogs
  • OSS News
  • Join a Project

{Open Source} Heroes Happen Here

Start today and order your own Hero Hack Pack – which includes Getting Started with Open Source, Windows Server 2008 and Visual Studio 2008 Trial. Each pack is a chance to win a free pass to OSCON 2008.







Technology White Papers

 

InfoWorld Technology Marketplace

» Technology White Papers Library

Technology White Papers by Topic

Technology White Papers E-mail Alert

Find out when the latest white paper is available:
 
 
» BUY A LINK NOW

Sponsored Technology Links