- Don't look back
- Is support for OSS optional in your business?
- Nokia N810 Tablet + WiMax
- Vendors need to right-size their products
- Dolphins Invade Sun Campus!
- State of Open Source
- MySQL Workbench: open source data modeling
- Comments on The 451 Group's Database Report & Red Hat's 4Q revenue
- Kaplan: Guiding open source in IT
- Can the transportation market teach us anything about the software market?
April 12, 2006 | Comments: (0)
Open source applications: We've reached the "laugh at you" phase
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.Mohandas Gandhi
Linux is in the "win" phase. Apache webserver is in the "won" phase. MySQL and JBoss are in the stage where the laughter turns bitter and the pushing starts. Big wins are on the horizon.
Open source applications? We're at the point the ignorance is breeding laughter. SugarCRM, Alfresco, JasperSoft, Plone, Compiere, etc. These are all applications that used to be ignored, but ignorance is no longer serving proprietary competitors well.
As a case in point, InformationWeek just ran a story on Boise Cascade's use of Alfresco for invoice management. Big customer, big need, big value.
Documentum's response? Completely off-base, ill-founded commentary ("Boise's need to cobble together links between Alfresco and MySQL is one reason some parties turn to commercial document management systems") that open source solutions require development, and off-the-shelf proprietary software requires none. Not only is this not true, but it also cleverly hides a ball that every IT buyer already knows: EVERY ERP/CRM/ECM solution requires customization/development.
Documentum not require heavy customization to make it even remotely relevant for a company? Of course it does. The difference is that the entry-level cost for one of these proprietary systems is in the six figure range (server costs), which only is exacerbated by per user costs.
Run SAP or Siebel out of the box? Of course you won't. The fact that they have more features (in some cases) does not mean that any buyer immediately, out-of-the-box benefits from those features. Most proprietary systems in the ERP/ECM/CRM/etc. worlds are cobbled together "suites" from years of acquisition. Much of the integration work on any given IT project is likely due to getting their own products to work together, nevermind getting them to work within the business processes and infrastructure of the customer.
Let's not try to obscure the issue for IT buyers. Customization is standard. The question is how much a buyer needs to pay for a vendor to deliver the 20-80% of a products features they won't actually use. Open source (well done) offers a granular way to tailor software to an enterprise's needs. Do creative, development-minded enterprises benefit more from open source today than more passive consumers of technology? Probably.
But that is a momentary blip, if it's a blip at all. Laugh while you can. Better get ready to fight. Because we're planning to win.
Posted by Matt Asay on April 12, 2006 09:34 AM
RATE THIS ARTICLE:
-

- COMMENTS
hi matt,
nice QUOTE from Mahatma Gandhi(as he's known to Indians).
Not only opensource leaders but all leaders of new /different ideas should know about this quote.
BR,
~A
Five years ago or so, the large commercial ERP and CRM vendors were the only choices you had for large multi-hundred user deployments. SAP, Siebel (now Oracle), PeopleSoft (now Oracle), and Oracle were the only players in town. We saw license costs in the thousands of dollars per seat (discounted!), and integration costs at multiples of 3-5 times license cost. An open secret of the CRM/ERP industry (especially among the integrators who actually implemented these projects) was that the very-expensive industry-vertical functionality was often not a good fit at all for large implementations, but was routinely purchased anyway.
These multi-million dollar projects led to some great successes and some spectacular failures, and the high cost of these projects opened the door to commoditization, with thousands of vendors entering the ring hoping to capture the SMB market. Microsoft's CRM offering and NetSuite were emblematic of this second-wave commoditization.
One side-effect of this, and the maturing and consolidation of the big players, was that the core feature set needed by a credible open-source entrant into this market is now well-understood. Open source or commercial open source projects like Compiere ERP+CRM, XRMS CRM, and SugarCRM offer the vast majority of the standard features of the big vendors, and allow integration for industry-specific verticals. I think that the first casualties of this new market will be the SMB commercial vendors, who can't compete on either price or quality with the open source vendors.
Posted by: Brian Peterson at April 13, 2006 05:00 AMI remember reading some years back about a Siebel contract with a large Fortune 500 company. It was supposed to be a ten million dollar contract.
It ended up costing ONE HUNDRED MILLION dollars before the implementation was frozen - because they didn't have any money in the budget for training the end users!
When I read that, several thoughts immediately crossed my mind:
1) How could can Siebel be when they have a ten-fold cost overrun?
2) How smart could their client be to allow a ten-fold cost overrun?
3) If Siebel is this incompetent, I can take their business.
4) Who set up a contract without budgeting for training?
5) Pay me ten million dollars and I'll solve ALL your IT problems by Tuesday before lunch.
It also reminded me of the time one of the large insurance companies sued the COBOL Standard Committee because they had just spent ten years converting their millions of lines of COBOL code from the previous standard to the last standard and didn't want to convert again to the NEW standard.
This was a company that had such a huge IT department that they had a TWO-HUNDRED-FIFTY-MAN COMPUTER SCIENCE department WITHIN their IT department.
I thought that if I had such a department, I would have Hal 9000 on their systems by Tuesday before lunch. Why is it they couldn't even convert their COBOL code from one version of COBOL to another?
There is no limit to the incompetence in IT. That is why Linux and OSS is having such a hard time penetrating the corporate marketplace. Period. There are NO technical reasons for this (aside from a certain lack of enterprise class applications, which are slowly being developed in OSS). It's entirely a management issue.
You want to solve your IT problems? Call me.
The only requirement is that you actually listen to what I tell you.
Hi Matt,
I can definitively tell you that Documentum has passed the "laugh at you" with us Nuxeo and they are now in the "fight you" phase on the ECM market.
Posted by: Stefane Fermigier at April 14, 2006 12:31 AM
- Get Started
- Port 25 Blogs
- OSS News
- Join a Project
{Open Source} Heroes Happen Here
Start today and order your own Hero Hack Pack – which includes Getting Started with Open Source, Windows Server 2008 and Visual Studio 2008 Trial. Each pack is a chance to win a free pass to OSCON 2008.
TOP STORIES
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

- Remote Access: Maintain Security and Decrease the Burden on IT
- Beyond AntiVirus: Symantec Endpoint Protection
- What Every Enterprise Needs to Know About VDI

- Disaster Recovery in Minutes
- Protecting Microsoft(R) Applications
- Reduce Recovery Times and Tape Costs








