Free Newsletters

   All InfoWorld Newsletters
Open Sources | Rodrigues & Urlocker » Upgrading the JBoss development model? (RHEJ)

November 15, 2006 | Comments: (0)

Upgrading the JBoss development model? (RHEJ)

Matthew Aslett notes that Red Hat is planning to release the next version of JBoss in the same way it does its Linux products: Fedora and Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Speaking at the UBS Global Communications and Technology Conference, Red Hat's EVP and CFO, Charlie Peters, said the company is working on a plan to create a Fedora-style community development version of JBoss as well as a subscription-only RHEL-style package.

"One of the things that we're trying to address is the development model, to come up with something similar to the RHEL/Fedora model," he told the conference. "At the moment we're still working on that model for JBoss, it's not a model that they had before," he added.

A change in the package model is part of the company's plans to convert the 11 million free JBoss users to subscription customers, Peters added. "We have an installed user base today that are natural customers when they get to the point of needing to have better support," he said.

This is a smart move and, in my opinion, continues to demonstrate the superiority of Red Hat's model over other open source models in the industry (though, perhaps, the model doesn't fit as well for "non-complicated" applications, as Red Hat's Brian Stevens has suggested).

It's a great way to give developers what they want - cutting edge, free (as in cost and freedom) technology - and to give enterprises what they want - painless way to adopt that great technology.

Posted by Matt Asay on November 15, 2006 10:04 AM


RATE THIS ARTICLE:





 

  •  
  • COMMENTS




The paid-support model's downside: making simplicity, preconfiguration, self-tuning and intuitive design the enemies of revenue growth.

Posted by: ideaz at November 15, 2006 06:39 PM

What about customers and partners that don't want to pay for support? What happens to them?

This move is incredibly bad for partners because it's going to force every ISV and SI that is considering JBoss to enter into a licensing deal with JBoss (i.e. pay for support etc.). While this may be okay for Alfresco, I've spoken to literally hundreds of smaller ISV/SIs that sell to SMB customers and don’t have the margin room to get railroaded by this Red Hat/JBoss revenue grab. These partners who are using or considering JBoss are surely going to look elsewhere.

I believe that Apache Geronimo & WAS CE are much better alternatives, and they're free to use and distribute without support. Just like these forgotten customers and partners expect. And based on the recent WAS CE Partner Initiative results, it seems that partners are totally getting it!

Posted by: Savio Rodrigues at November 21, 2006 07:08 AM

Microsoft Mini Spotlight
  • Get Started
  • Port 25 Blogs
  • OSS News
  • Join a Project

{Open Source} Heroes Happen Here

Start today and order your own Hero Hack Pack – which includes Getting Started with Open Source, Windows Server 2008 and Visual Studio 2008 Trial. Each pack is a chance to win a free pass to OSCON 2008.







Technology White Papers

 

InfoWorld Technology Marketplace

» Technology White Papers Library

Technology White Papers by Topic

Technology White Papers E-mail Alert

Find out when the latest white paper is available:
 
 
» BUY A LINK NOW

Sponsored Technology Links