Free Newsletters

  
Open Sources | Rodrigues & Urlocker » FSG and OSDL merge

January 22, 2007 | Comments: (0)

FSG and OSDL merge

As eWeek is reporting, the Free Standards Group and OSDL have merged to form the Linux Foundation. It's about time. There has been precisely zero value in having the two organizations functioning separately. OSDL was little more than the big vendors' attempt to remain front-and-center with Linux, and FSG was always more relevant to developers, though a bit hampered by its lack of connection to the big vendors.

Today, they're the same, and I think that's a good thing.

Jim Zemlin (of the FSG) will run the Linux Foundation, which is a big positive, in my view. Jim "gets" Linux and what needs to happen:

I clearly understand what the charter of the organization needs to be: we need to provide services that are useful to the community and industry, as well as protect, promote and continue to standardize the platform.
That's right: you can't have industry without community, but you also can't really have community without industry. It's a symbiotic relationship, and one that will be well-served by bringing the two together.

It is still, however, an open question as to how much value any organization can bring to the market, given that the market is already voting for a vendor-sponsored standard, otherwise known as "Red Hat." Jim said:

We need to be innovative in defining a new wave to promote the platform, one in which everyone can participate equally," Zemlin said. "We also need to find a new and interesting way in which to create standards that blend open source upstream standardization—in the form of code collaboration—with downstream customer-facing standards that guarantee, so to speak, certain interfaces exist over time, and test suites to back that up.
All true, but it doesn't really address the larger question as to what to do with Red Hat. Red Hat doesn't need the Linux Foundation nearly as much as it needs Red Hat. The real question, then, will be how well the Linux Foundation works with Red Hat. Any attempts to go around it (OSDL is one example, as was United Linux) will fail.

Posted by Matt Asay on January 22, 2007 11:34 AM


RATE THIS ARTICLE:





 

  •  
  • COMMENTS




I agree to the industry community relationship idea. Isn't it possible to have a very strong Red Hat partnership with the new merged organization? Who knows? Seems like 2007 will be a turning point for OSS!

Posted by: Marketing in Pakistan at January 23, 2007 09:12 AM

You're right that the world doesn't need 2 OSS nonprofits, particularly given that OSDL's business model seems to have failed.

I also agree that the surviving foundation needs Red Hat more than Red Hat needs it. But what about IBM & HP (now that Intel's faded to the background)? Do they need LF to cooperate and promote their common interest (e.g. stealing server sales from Solaris, having an alternative to Microsoft)?

My sense is that even more than before, the big vendors will drive the LF agenda. No matter how cocky Red Hat is, if IBM and HP said "we will only recommend a LSB-compliant Linux" I suspect Red Hat would continue to send in those membership checks.

Posted by: Joel West at January 23, 2007 01:38 PM

Agreed... Might is right!

Let's see how HP & IBM shape up the OSS world in the coming months.

Posted by: Marketing in Pakistan at January 31, 2007 05:54 AM

Microsoft Mini Spotlight
  • Get Started
  • Port 25 Blogs
  • OSS News
  • Join a Project

{Open Source} Heroes Happen Here

Start today and order your own Hero Hack Pack – which includes Getting Started with Open Source, Windows Server 2008 and Visual Studio 2008 Trial. Each pack is a chance to win a free pass to OSCON 2008.







Technology White Papers

 

InfoWorld Technology Marketplace

» Technology White Papers Library

Technology White Papers by Topic

Technology White Papers E-mail Alert

Receive instant email notification when resources on this topic become available.
 
» BUY A LINK NOW

Sponsored Technology Links