- Don't look back
- Is support for OSS optional in your business?
- Nokia N810 Tablet + WiMax
- Vendors need to right-size their products
- Dolphins Invade Sun Campus!
- State of Open Source
- MySQL Workbench: open source data modeling
- Comments on The 451 Group's Database Report & Red Hat's 4Q revenue
- Kaplan: Guiding open source in IT
- Can the transportation market teach us anything about the software market?
June 29, 2007 | Comments: (0)
Is Red Hat Exchange DOA?
Via Dana & Matt, The Register reports that the Red Hat Exchange (RHX) "roars like a muted lamb". The Register's point is that RHX has met with a lukewarm reception to date.
After reading the following comment from Matt, with his VP of business development at Alfresco hat on, I wonder if The Register story is missing the point.
"So, again, in terms of traffic, it's not yet on par with Sourceforge and other avenues for us," Asay said. "But it has been surprisingly fruitful given the number of downloads and trials we've had through it. If we had this same ratio of download to trial to conversion on Sourceforge, we'd be IPO'ing tomorrow."
The open source community really doesn’t need another arena for projects to live and be downloaded from. There are plenty of players in this space (Sourceforge, Apache, Google, Codehaus, etc.). RHX isn't intended to drive 1M downloads a day, or hundreds of project ratings. These are functions that developers generally do. Enterprise buyers and decision makers are less likely (not unlikely) to play this role.
RHX appears to be where projects graduate to after they've proven their chops at Sourceforge et al.
As I see it, RHX is intended to serve the needs of an enterprise decision maker that is already using RHEL and wonders: "okay Red Hat, what else do you recommend I try?" or "what CRM app should I use with RHEL?" Try answering either of these questions at Sourceforge.
The higher conversion rate that Matt alludes to on RHX should be the key metric for evaluating the success of RHX.
Posted by Savio Rodrigues on June 29, 2007 11:46 AM
RATE THIS ARTICLE:
-

- COMMENTS
I would like to know (maybe Matt can comment) how OSA is doing. Based on some articles and a recent promotional mention in Linux.com (OSTG), it appears as though people just prefer the good 'ol download-and-install route, which is decentralised. OSA achieves something that's very different from RHX, Market Start and all sorts of indexes and grouping of projects (OSAlt, Ohloh, etc), but there hasn't been much to indicate that the effort bears fruit. Have any projects improved their relationships? Any real joints or is it akin to the LF/OIN where many companies just come together for the sake of scale?
Posted by: Roy Schestowitz at June 29, 2007 07:48 PM
- Get Started
- Port 25 Blogs
- OSS News
- Join a Project
{Open Source} Heroes Happen Here
Start today and order your own Hero Hack Pack – which includes Getting Started with Open Source, Windows Server 2008 and Visual Studio 2008 Trial. Each pack is a chance to win a free pass to OSCON 2008.
TOP STORIES
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

- Remote Access: Maintain Security and Decrease the Burden on IT
- Beyond AntiVirus: Symantec Endpoint Protection
- What Every Enterprise Needs to Know About VDI

- Solution for Open Virtualization Provides Server Consolidation
- Help Simplify Virtualization
- A Guide to Rich Internet Application (RIA) Security








