Free Newsletters

   All InfoWorld Newsletters
Open Sources | Rodrigues & Urlocker » Building Customer Trust with OSS

August 20, 2007 | Comments: (0)

Building Customer Trust with OSS

I was reading this BusinessWeek article about the recent financial market mess:

"If you don't trust the value of an asset, you won't be willing to buy it no matter how cheap your borrowing costs are....What brings this to an end, ultimately, is better information and transparency."

Apply this idea to the software market, and more specifically, to the software acquisition process.

OSS provides transparency as the code is available in the open. OSS can also be more transparent than Traditional software depending on whether future product discussions happen in the open.

OSS can also provide better information by allowing potential customers to use the product before purchasing support, (or running without support).

Better information and transparency build trust. It goes without saying that building trust was, and remains, a key hurdle for startups. The fact that OSS can help build customer trust explains why so many enterprise software startups choose to incorporate OSS into their business model. Historically, a brand has been the embodiment of the level of trust that a customer places in a vendor's products. For startups, their brand has yet to be associated with a level of customer expectations. Hence, building trust through better information and transparency is vital to success.

Enterprise software startups can gain customer trust without going down the OSS route. Free (but not open source) software and trials are two alternatives. One could argue that shareware has been around for decades, and yet hasn't helped the average enterprise software vendor build customer trust in the way that OSS does. There is clearly a transparency benefit (via the source) that helps build customer trust faster than free (but closed) software or trialware does.

A question I've been thinking about but haven't fully developed an answer: Can a vendor drive more revenue by:

  1. Distributing 10 million copies of an OSS product and then trying to convert 0.001%-0.01% of the user base into paying support customers
  2. Marketing & selling a commercial (non-OSS) product which is able to attract 10,000 paying customers (maybe using a SaaS model?)

Thoughts?

PS: I should state: "The postings on this site are my own and don’t necessarily represent IBM’s positions, strategies or opinions."

Posted by Savio Rodrigues on August 20, 2007 11:37 AM


RATE THIS ARTICLE:





 

  •  
  • COMMENTS




Interesting question, Savio. I am starting to get questions like this from the investment community.

My first takes are that it depends on the size of the target audience and the universality of the value prop. (and at 10,000,000--if you were being literal in your "what if"--the logistics are such that it would still have to be marketed even if not literally sold).

10,000,000 was the universe of developers worldwide just a few years ago as you know from research you and I have discussed in the past. So you have to have something almost everyone in the development community should have if that's the audience for your OSS? If so, go for it and the conversion rate should even be higher than your what if in my opinion (if they SHOULD have it).

For software with a smaller potential audience (but bigger than one per server/enterprise/whatever the metric is) and/or less univeral appeal, every case I can think of has some SaaS-like or pre-SaaS try-it-you'll-like-it element to it.

For larger audiences with theoretically broader appeal, the ubiquitous AOL CD in your mailbox is the case study. I never saw the numbers on that but I think they are public in various Time Warner SEC material.

The most interesting finding I am coming up with so far is that the answers (the possible tactics, the likely outcomes, and so forth) are the same whether or not it's OSS or old-fashioned closed source code.

Posted by: Dennis Byron at August 20, 2007 01:51 PM

There's more to open source than just stats, most notably a factor that is customarily overlooked.

Open source licenses -particularly epitomized by the GNU GPL- eliminate the friction and costs implied in commercial software licencing.

Open source licencing leverages synergies of world scale.
I don't need to know Chul Ho in Seoul to use his code and get bootstrapped fast, I don't even have to call him, I just take the code because I know the licence, I'm aware of the benefits and obligations, there's simply no overhead.

Scale that to millions of developers worldwide.

Extrapolate.

There's more to economy than just sales.

Posted by: vruz at August 21, 2007 12:29 AM

Microsoft Mini Spotlight
  • Get Started
  • Port 25 Blogs
  • OSS News
  • Join a Project

{Open Source} Heroes Happen Here

Start today and order your own Hero Hack Pack – which includes Getting Started with Open Source, Windows Server 2008 and Visual Studio 2008 Trial. Each pack is a chance to win a free pass to OSCON 2008.







Technology White Papers

 

InfoWorld Technology Marketplace

» Technology White Papers Library

Technology White Papers by Topic

Technology White Papers E-mail Alert

Find out when the latest white paper is available:
 
 
» BUY A LINK NOW

Sponsored Technology Links