- Don't look back
- Is support for OSS optional in your business?
- Nokia N810 Tablet + WiMax
- Vendors need to right-size their products
- Dolphins Invade Sun Campus!
- State of Open Source
- MySQL Workbench: open source data modeling
- Comments on The 451 Group's Database Report & Red Hat's 4Q revenue
- Kaplan: Guiding open source in IT
- Can the transportation market teach us anything about the software market?
November 26, 2007 | Comments: (0)
I think Microsoft has an OSS Strategy
Shaun Connolly from JBoss/Red Hat has a nice summary of Microsoft's Open Source Strategy. In the post, Shaun states:
"As much as I hate to say it, Microsoft could learn something from IBM's strategy. They make no bones about it: they work in the open source on piece-part components that they Bluewash into their closed-source products. While it's not a pure open source business model...it's clearly an open source strategy."
I think Microsoft has an OSS strategy.
It's not the one described in Bill Hiff's recent interview. That's the difference between how you run your business, and what you tell the press and competitors. Call me crazy, but I think that Microsoft's OSS strategy is "Grin and bear it". Okay, get up off the floor...Grin and bear it is a valid strategy if you know "it" isn't going to last forever. Yes, OSS is here to stay, but the competitive differentiation that OSS gives to an OSS vendor isn't infinite. The support-only OSS business model does not scale. I'm made the claim that this differentiation decreases as the OSS vendor starts to grow beyond $250M in annual revenue.
Since I've made this claim twice without Matt, Dave, or JBoss/RH readers calling me out, I'm going to guess that they agree with the claim to some degree. I *think* that Marc Fleury believes the same and said so much on the Open Season podcast. I found this on Fleury's RSS feed (via Google Reader), but it looks like the post itself has been moved?:
"I don't want to come across as the ultimate realist but as far as scalable business models go, we still haven't found anything better than a proprietary distribution of open source software."
Imagine that you are at Microsoft and see the competitive differentiation from OSS waning as the competitor grows closer to $500M. Would you rush out and change the business model that created a $50B company?
"Grin, and bear it": Not just a strategy for Toronto Maple Leaf fans anymore ;-)
PS: I should state: "The postings on this site are my own and don’t necessarily represent IBM’s positions, strategies or opinions."
Posted by Savio Rodrigues on November 26, 2007 04:13 PM
RATE THIS ARTICLE:
-

- COMMENTS
Nice comment, I agree on what you said. I've added some fuel to the debate on my blog and I'm interested in your opinion.
http://maffulli.net/2007/11/28/open-source-microsofts-split-personality/
Cheers
stef
@Todd, ROTFL - well said.
@Stefano, yes, I agree about the split personality that MSFT appears to have with OSS. It must be difficult for them considering their revenue base and the risk that OSS presents...vs. the opportunity. I could make the argument that the opportunity is lower than the risk to Microsoft....
Posted by: Savio Rodrigues at November 29, 2007 06:05 AM
- Get Started
- Port 25 Blogs
- OSS News
- Join a Project
{Open Source} Heroes Happen Here
Start today and order your own Hero Hack Pack – which includes Getting Started with Open Source, Windows Server 2008 and Visual Studio 2008 Trial. Each pack is a chance to win a free pass to OSCON 2008.
TOP STORIES
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

- Remote Access: Maintain Security and Decrease the Burden on IT
- Beyond AntiVirus: Symantec Endpoint Protection
- What Every Enterprise Needs to Know About VDI

- Solution for Open Virtualization Provides Server Consolidation
- Help Simplify Virtualization
- A Guide to Rich Internet Application (RIA) Security








