- Don't look back
- Is support for OSS optional in your business?
- Nokia N810 Tablet + WiMax
- Vendors need to right-size their products
- Dolphins Invade Sun Campus!
- State of Open Source
- MySQL Workbench: open source data modeling
- Comments on The 451 Group's Database Report & Red Hat's 4Q revenue
- Kaplan: Guiding open source in IT
- Can the transportation market teach us anything about the software market?
March 12, 2008 | Comments: (0)
Why Adoption Matters
I don't usually comment too much on other people's blogs --it just becomes too much of an echo chamber --but I thought a recent posting by Savio on the adoption-led model could benefit from another perspective. I'm not sure what caused Savio to dismiss the adoption-led model as a move back to shareware. Maybe all the snow back east is giving him cabin fever! My perspective is a bit different.
I don't think the adoption model is a step backwards except in one very important sense: it restores more power into the hands of buyers. To me that's one of the great benefits of open source software. As Simon Phipps points out, developers can try out the software and decide what works best to meet their needs.
The reason I joined MySQL 4 1/2 years ago was because I felt that the old model of selling Enterprise software was broken. Companies charged millions of dollars for Enterprise software that rarely performed as needed. Few IT departments were successful in implementing all these applications and return on investment was miserable. Most implementations I saw ran years late and cost millions more in budget overruns. And Enterprise software companies were always pushing "the next big thing" --some new set of features that added more complexity and bloat.
Open source has returned some of the power to buyers by letting them download and use the software without having to deal with smooth-talking Armani-wearing sales reps. The result: less complexity, lower cost of sales and greater efficiency both for buyers and for vendors.
I'm not suggesting that all closed source enterprise software is bloated or over-priced or that all open source software is perfect. It's up to the users to decide what works best to solve their problems. With open source, they have that option.
Has the adoption-led model been successful? I think there's compelling evidence, both in closed source and in open source. Consider McAfee anti-virus software, ZoneLabs intrusion detection software, SNORT security software, MySQL, Linux, JBoss, Eclipse, to name a few...
Maybe there are other examples that come to mind. Or am I just basking in too much California optimism? Let me know what you think.
Posted by Zack Urlocker on March 12, 2008 02:51 PM
RATE THIS ARTICLE:
-

- COMMENTS
Oh, adoption matters.
Zack,
Adoption matters whether it's hardware, software, cars, electricity or lima beans. In all cases, adoption drives economies of scale. In turn, reduction of costs assist in building an ecosystem surrounding the product. But let me stick to software.
Thanks for pointing out Savio's ridiculous rant. The thing that irritates about me about his blog is:
1. Open Source provides that access to source code thing (versus Shareware) which puts the developers in closer contact with users. I think of this, to borrow Simon Phipp's terminology, as user-led innovation. Simon does make this point. But an infinitesimally small number of users also choose to contribute and even innovate. This is one of the reasons behind community growth for open source projects.
2. As the user base grows, the community provides enormous value beyond feedback on product direction. Users, or even VARs, localize projects. With large enough communities, testing and validation surpasses typical beta testing of proprietary software. With the largest projects, like the Linux kernel, innovation happens at a rate not seen in any software project (see Greg Kroah-Hartman's blog: http://www.kroah.com/linux).
In other words, I'm saying adoption matters because of the community's ability to add value. This just doesn't happen, and can't, with Shareware...
Posted by: Pete Kronowitt at March 12, 2008 06:08 PMAnother way of putting it is that an adoption-led model matters most where economies of scale matter most. If I'm selling million dollar software to five customers, who cares about adoption? At that point its all about paying big dollars for high quality elephant hunters. But if my entire business model is built around selling to a HUGE audience, then it's all about the EYEBALLS.
I had the opportunity to catch up recently with an old colleague from Epiphany who is now at the Dublin office of Google. We were sharing notes on how the business models of Google and SugarCRM were so much more similar to each other than compared to yesterday's enterprise CRM software "Armani-wearing" style of Epiphany (err, SSA Global, no I meant Infor).
We talked about how the three most important things in today's world of enterprise software are eyeballs, eyeballs and eyeballs. The metrics I look at every day at Sugar are downloads, installs and live systems.
Commercial open source businesses need mass adoption in order to be successful. But another way of looking at it is that commercial open source can only be successful if mass adoption is possible.
Posted by: Clint Oram at March 17, 2008 04:09 PM
- Get Started
- Port 25 Blogs
- OSS News
- Join a Project
{Open Source} Heroes Happen Here
Start today and order your own Hero Hack Pack – which includes Getting Started with Open Source, Windows Server 2008 and Visual Studio 2008 Trial. Each pack is a chance to win a free pass to OSCON 2008.
TOP STORIES
Top 10 stories of the weekA new place to hide rootkits
Sun exec on OpenSolaris, Linux
AT&T: No free iPhone Wi-Fi info
MS to appeal E.U. fine
XP SP3 causes endless reboots
Vista as insecure as Win 2000
Google grilled on human rights
Java ubiquity an edge in RIA battle
The InfoWorld news quiz
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

- Virtualization: A Step by Step Approach to Success
- Dialing up Agility with Business Transformation
- 5 Things You Need to Know About Storage Virtualization

- Virtual Test Lab Automation: Manage development infrastructure
- Improve Resource Utilization and Lower Operating Costs
- Protect Your Data with SSL








