- Don't look back
- Is support for OSS optional in your business?
- Nokia N810 Tablet + WiMax
- Vendors need to right-size their products
- Dolphins Invade Sun Campus!
- State of Open Source
- MySQL Workbench: open source data modeling
- Comments on The 451 Group's Database Report & Red Hat's 4Q revenue
- Kaplan: Guiding open source in IT
- Can the transportation market teach us anything about the software market?
April 04, 2008 | Comments: (0)
Is support for OSS optional in your business?
Jon Williams, CTO at Kaplan Test Prep co-founder of the New York CTO club, and InfoWorld blogger, wrote something very interesting:
"....Matt Asay, OSBC organizer and also an open source vendor. He asked me the following:- "If an open source platform is stable and my team experienced with it, would I continue to pay annual support fees?". Unfortunately for the vendors, the answer was "no". It truly is a contradiction because if customers don't pay a vendor, they'll go out of business and their products will not be further developed. Frankly, I don't have a better answer. But that said, IMO, open source is a model that is here to stay. Vendors are diving into it and making money, although nowhere near Microsoft's current profit margins."
I spoke to several customers at EclipseCON about their use of open source, and specifically the support around the OSS products in use. The contradiction that Jon points out is something that I heard in spades. Namely, "I will buy support for the first year while my developers get comfortable with the product. But after a year, at most two, we'll know enough to be able to support ourselves." One person implementing an OSS content management product said: "We don't need on-going support, we need installation support and someone to call in the first 2 months while we implement the product, but after that, I don't see a need for support beyond what we'll get from Google searches".
I had discounted these comments, especially about only requiring help during the installation process as they mostly came from very small companies (<100 employees?). Maybe I need to re-think this. If these views are/become widespread, they reinforce my view that a support only business isn't the path forward for OSS. Red Hat was way ahead of us all in recognizing this and offering gated access to their products.
PS: I should state: "The postings on this site are my own and don’t necessarily represent IBM’s positions, strategies or opinions."
Posted by Savio Rodrigues on April 4, 2008 07:48 AM
RATE THIS ARTICLE:
-

- COMMENTS

- Get Started
- Port 25 Blogs
- OSS News
- Join a Project
{Open Source} Heroes Happen Here
Start today and order your own Hero Hack Pack – which includes Getting Started with Open Source, Windows Server 2008 and Visual Studio 2008 Trial. Each pack is a chance to win a free pass to OSCON 2008.
TOP STORIES
Hyperconnected users growingSteve Jobs to keynote WWDC
CSC settles kickbacks case
MS previews SMB software
What does HP-EDS really mean?
Mac Office 2008 SP1 released
HP buys EDS for $13.9 billion
Corporate IT spending slows
MS targets smartphone market
Sun to clarify JavaFX plan
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

- Virtualization: A Step by Step Approach to Success
- Dialing up Agility with Business Transformation
- 5 Things You Need to Know About Storage Virtualization

- Is your smaller organization ready for High Availability?
- Is system maintenance doing more harm than good?
- Virtual Test Lab Automation: Manage development infrastructure








