Free Newsletters

   All InfoWorld Newsletters
Reality Check | Ephraim Schwartz » Opinion poll --- Should YouTube supply the identity of ECOtotal?

January 26, 2007 | Comments: (0)

Opinion poll --- Should YouTube supply the identity of ECOtotal?

According to the story posted today by Forbes , News Corp.'s Twentieth Century Fox has subpoenaed YouTube to give up the real name of the person or persons known as ECOtotal who posted pirated clips of an unaired episode of the popular television show "24"

The clips were taken down but New's Corp still wants the name[s] of the so-called perpetrator[s].

The question is what's right and what's wrong?

While YouTube and the 'net have always placed a high value on a certain anti-establishment chic, as a writer this issue hits very close to home.

If I were writing a novel and someone was able to obtain chapters and post them online before it was published I would be very upset.

So is this any different?

Would I want the identity of the person or persons who stole my book and uploaded it revealed so they couldn't do it again?

Yes.

Would I want them to be prosecuted?

No.

Is this analogy appropriate?

I'm not sure. Certainly, television shows want publicity and it could be argued that "24" and other shows always air small clips ahead of time to entice the viewer. It's called coming attractions in the movies.

Is this different? Well, certainly ECOtotal doesn't own those clips but you have the last word.

Send in your comments on whether YouTube and its parent company, Google, should reveal the name of ECOtotal or not.

Posted by Ephraim Schwartz on January 26, 2007 11:03 AM


RATE THIS ARTICLE:





 

  •  
  • COMMENTS




He should be prosecuted. Stealing, whether it be software, art, someone else's creativity, a tangible item like your car, is all the same. It is stealing and it is a crime.
I do not understand your mentality of trying to stop the individual from doing it but not prosecuting it. Just stop the criminal from getting into my house, but, poor soul, don't send him to jail!

Posted by: Eduardo Cruz at January 26, 2007 09:09 PM

I, too, am an artist and have also worked for a media conglomerate myself, but my view differs from the comment above. I believe that the day of reckoning has come for many of the media giants, which I don't think will be a bad thing. The days of premiers with high price tagged commercials will soon be long gone. Fox should be honored that 24 was hot enough so many years after its pilot to draw someone to bootleg it and risk prosecution. While I do believe that the line between fraudulence and intellectual property has been blurred, I doubt that arresting a broke college kid or computer geek will do little more than spawn backlash toward the network and fill YouTube will a barrage of parody videos. Many of the major media networks---as well as Hollywood---need to come up with a better strategy to deal with web 2.0 than "whining to the principal." Open source and web 2.0 are just some ideologies that will take getting used to...all of us.

Posted by: em at January 27, 2007 08:38 PM

They shouldn't fight this because it will lead nowhere. Who in their right mind would open a YouTube (or any other such account) using their real information, if they intended on posting pirated works??? I give the human race a wee bit of credit to realize that if you could get caught doing something you shouldn't, you cover your tracks... If the poster of the video had half a brain (which I assume that he did) then all Fox would probably get is an IP address and a fake name that leads nowhere.

Posted by: Markian Zadony at January 29, 2007 11:30 AM

Technology White Papers

 

InfoWorld Technology Marketplace

» Technology White Papers Library

Technology White Papers by Topic

Technology White Papers E-mail Alert

Find out when the latest white paper is available:
 
 
» BUY A LINK NOW

Sponsored Technology Links