- Swallowing Yahoo may make Microsoft want to take a nap
- ISO approves OOXML as standard
- Maintaining integrity on the Net
- Microsoft caves, in part, to online computing
- Eyewitness to H-1B scammers
- Social networking hits the bar scene big screen
- Is the slow economy hurting high-tech sales?
- Take the smarts out of smartphones
- U.S. Immigration [USCIS] changes selection process for H-1B visas
- Will the iPhone force Apple to change course?
August 06, 2007 | Comments: (0)
Yahoo under fire for revealing info to Chinese government
Sometimes chickens do come home to roost.
Back in October 2005, I wrote about Yahoo turning over e-mail account information to the Chinese government, resulting in a 10-year prison sentence for a reporter who posted material on a foreign Web site about a government crackdown on media and activists.
For more on Chinese justice, read this post from the New York Times (registration required).
Yahoo's excuse at the time was that "its local country sites must operate within the laws, regulations, and customs of the country in which they are based."
Yahoo also claimed "it did not know what he [Shi Tao] was being investigated for," according to the House Foreign Affairs Committee statement.
Well, it turns out that is not true, and now the chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Tom Lantos, says Congress will look into whether Yahoo "misrepresented the company's role in a human rights case in China that sent a journalist to jail for a decade." Lantos also co-chairs the Congressional Human Rights Caucus.
In the full statement from the committee, this paragraph forms the heart of it and bears repeating.
"It is bad enough that a wealthy American company would willingly supply Chinese police the means to hunt a man down for shedding light on repression in China," said Lantos.
He added, "Covering up such a despicable practice when Congress seeks an explanation is a serious offense."
When Congress originally questioned Yahoo general counsel Michael Callahan about the case, Callahan testified that "we had no information about the nature of the investigation."
However, the San Francisco-based human rights organization Dui Hua Foundation has documents that show the Chinese government did inform Yahoo about the nature of the investigation.
Here's a partial translation of the notice sent by the Beijing State Security Bureau to Yahoo officials.
"According to investigation, your office is in possession of the following items relating to a case of suspecting illegal provision of state secrets to foreign entities that is currently under investigation by our bureau."
The items for collection, the notification went on to say, were "e-mail account registration information," and it gave Yahoo the e-mail name of the poster so that the company could ID the sender.
Well, someone once said, "The wheels of justice grind slow, but they grind exceedingly fine."
Maybe sometimes it is true, and we will see Yahoo and other large companies reprimanded for cooperating with totalitarian governments in this manner. Perhaps the bad publicity will even make them think twice next time they are confronted with a similar situation.
While one company can claim it cannot afford not to cooperate since its competitors do, maybe this Congressional investigation will create a single policy to which all American companies must adhere, thus making it easier for a single company to behave decently and ethically.
Posted by Ephraim Schwartz on August 6, 2007 02:40 PM
RATE THIS ARTICLE:
-

- COMMENTS
You would think in these modern times that governments would govern instead of playing these midevil games of oppression and caretaking.
If the Chinese government does not like what the blogger is saying why prosecute him? Why not look into what the objection is all about?
China wants to become a great nation a leader. Well why not learn lessons from the past? Why not learn tht oppression is not the answer?
The world can no longer afford wars or the egomania of its leaders. The terraforming of the globe is no joke. Now the emplements of war truly are capable of annilating the planet of life.
Posted by: WebSpeak Ezine at August 6, 2007 09:50 PMHow can a company disregard a persons private e-mail? Does that mean to me that my e-mails will be scrutinized.
Posted by: nic c garcia at August 7, 2007 09:01 PMBoycott Yahoo.
There is no excuse for this behavior. They should be punished in the court of public opinion.
Pass the word - Boycott Yahoo.
Posted by: David at August 8, 2007 10:51 AMTOP STORIES
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

- Remote Access: Maintain Security and Decrease the Burden on IT
- Beyond AntiVirus: Symantec Endpoint Protection
- What Every Enterprise Needs to Know About VDI

- Help Simplify Virtualization
- Solution for Open Virtualization Provides Server Consolidation
- A Guide to Rich Internet Application (RIA) Security





