Free Newsletters

   All InfoWorld Newsletters
Notes from the Field | Robert X. Cringely® » Is Google 'hostile to privacy'?

June 12, 2007 | Comments: (0)

Is Google 'hostile to privacy'?

Privacy International has released preliminary findings of its study of privacy practices at 20 major Net companies, and has named Google the worst of a generally bad lot.

In its cheerfully color-coded system, only Google receives PI's black spot, labeled "Hostile to Privacy." Reading the comments in the prelim report (PDF), it seems Google is getting dinged primarily for a) collecting oodles of information, b) being vague about what it does with this data, and c) not returning PI's phone calls. Frustrating, yes. Alarming, maybe. But hostile?

If this was merely PI's way of getting Google's attention, it worked. Google allegedly responded by spreading rumors that PI was in Microsoft's pocket. (Knowing Simon Davies, PI's London-based head honcho, I'd say 'not bloody likely.') Davies responded to that by publishing a strongly worded open letter to Google CEO Eric Schmidt. The spitting match continues.

Other Net giants didn't fare much better. None of the 20 sites received PI's highest ranking (“privacy friendly and enhancing” -- a Robin Hood green), and only the BBC, eBay, Last.fm, LiveJournal, and Wikipedia were rated “generally privacy aware but in need of improvement” (hospital blue). AOL, Apple, Facebook, Hi5, Reunion.com, Windows Live Space, and Yahoo were labeled blood red "Substantial Threats."

It's great that organizations like the UK-based Privacy International (and its US counterparts like EPIC, EFF, and CDT) are fighting for individual rights in an increasingly surveilled world. But I think they may be overreaching a bit with this one.

I can think of plenty of folks hostile to privacy -- like China, the two dozen other countries that censor citizen access to the Internet, and our current administration. But Google is not the boogie man. At least, not yet.

Of course, I know what you're thinking, but the rest of the world doesn't. Share it with them below, or send a confidential email here. Top tipsters may receive a Cringe bag that blows their cover forever.

Posted by Robert X. Cringely on June 12, 2007 07:14 AM


RATE THIS ARTICLE:





 

  •  
  • COMMENTS




You know, if you had put an image of the Virgin Mary in your report, I might have paid attention. Especially, if she was toting a dwarf troodontid dinosaur. Get with the program.

Posted by: anon at June 12, 2007 10:56 AM

great idea. how about a piece of toast that looks like the Virgin Mary?

http://www.cooltoast.com/

rxc

Posted by: cringe at June 12, 2007 11:40 AM

http://searchengineland.com/070612-041042.php#comment-2852

Posted by: flingy at June 13, 2007 07:53 AM

When Google gets convicted of Doing Evil with our personal information, I'll start to worry. Heck, I'll worry if they are subject to a credible accusation. But so far I'll trust the Googlers a lot farther than most of the personal info hunters and gatherers out there.

Posted by: Rick Tavan at June 18, 2007 11:06 AM

Yes, Google is slowly getting too big. What's worse are the reactions people have: "So what? It's life!". And with this attitude, the whole industry keeps on getting... getting... worse?

Yes, no one trusts MS, or Google now and even, sniff, Apple. Yes, most people are complacent and help those said companies get away with things, and finally yes, it's a whole big dance where the best pogo dancers get the biggest piece of the dance floor. It's not about innovations, it's about market share through data collection.

After all it is about stepping over everyone's feet while collecting data to help focus their own focus while doing shady things with said data. or did I get it wrong?

Posted by: Nick at June 18, 2007 11:29 AM

I have a pretzel that looks like a diving nun from "History of the World, Part 1."

Posted by: phineas at June 20, 2007 08:44 AM

Wasn't google the only one that did not bow to the justice departments request for large quantities of search terms and the results?

Posted by: gostak at June 22, 2007 06:12 AM

Any report that lists Google as worse than AOL has got to be taken for what it is,... Toilet Paper.

Posted by: Hogar De Vuelta (العودة) at July 24, 2007 03:39 PM

Technology White Papers

 

InfoWorld Technology Marketplace

» Technology White Papers Library

Technology White Papers by Topic

Technology White Papers E-mail Alert

Find out when the latest white paper is available:
 
 
» BUY A LINK NOW

Sponsored Technology Links