Free Newsletters

   All InfoWorld Newsletters
Social Tech | Lena West » Who really owns social media? Hint: not you!

February 12, 2008 | Comments: (0) | TrackBacks: (1)

Who really owns social media? Hint: not you!

I've been reading the back and forth conversation about the ownership of social media over on Shel Holtz's blog.

This subject keeps cropping up more and more. It reminds me that far too many folks in corporate would rather focus on turf ownership than quality strategy. It's like a never-ending game of Monopoly gone horribly wrong. It makes me feel like I want to break out in hives.

Mitch Joel says that digital agencies should own the social media landscape. He says that traditional advertising agencies struggle with adding digital strategies to the pot and PR firms don't have the technical savvy to execute (I agree with this bit since this is a service that my company provides -- quite lucratively -- to PR firms).

Shel makes a good point by saying that it's not about "ownership" per se. Shel says:

With or without a Chief Repuation Officer, though, the accountability for a company’s social media belongs inside the organization.

My take is a bit different:

1. I agree that it isn't about ownership. And, yes, the final, line item accountability is definitely an internal matter.

Recently I spoke at the Social Media Summit and I was asked this same "ownership" question. My answer then is my answer now: corporations are so busy trying to work in this new space with old school business models, it's no wonder they're not making any headway.

The entire premise of social media is the word "social." Get it? As in, being friendly and sharing.

Now, I'm not one of these airy-fairy people who thinks that business is a democracy -- because it ain't -- but a company's social media efforts and governance needs to be shared amongst whatever departments and parties make sense for that particular company.

If it's just two departments, then so be it. If it's five then it's five -- as long as it's organized, of course.

2. Along the same lines, I think all the nuts-and-bolts aspects of social media should be outsourced -- organizations have better things to do than learning how to set up a Movable Type infrastructure, but the conversation, content and community should be watched over by the company.

3. Let we not forget that the real owners are the community members themselves. (Yep, I just had the throw that one in.)

Posted by Lena West on February 12, 2008 04:00 AM


RATE THIS ARTICLE:





 

  •  
  • COMMENTS




Thanks for the link. I still think one area of the company needs to manage and moderate. There are multiple skill sets with multiple sectors that it touches.

Of course I'd love for it to intersect at the industry I serve... but how social is that of me?

;)

Posted by: Mitch Joel - Twist Image at February 12, 2008 09:03 AM

Hey, you're welcome!

I do, too - hence point #2. Someone from the company has to be involved...evne at a high level, but I don't think they should have to be become social media experts to do so.

Thanks for commenting...

-Lena

Posted by: Lena West at February 12, 2008 10:10 AM

Hey, but people who work for companies can be community members too! I think the important point for companies to learn is that communities require that you participate as people, not abstract corporate entities. And that you arrive at the conversation with a point of view, not a message...

Here is another guideline that works -- if it is about being reactive to something going on in a community, someone from the company should ALWAYS be the respondent. Because it has to be someone accountable. If it is proactive, companies can seek help as long as it is transparent.

Posted by: Ted Shelton at February 12, 2008 06:58 PM

@Ted:

I absolutely agree.

Outsource the technical bits (hopefully to my company!) and the warm and fuzzy needs to come from teh company.

See you tomorrow @ The New Conversation event.

-Lena

Posted by: Lena West at February 12, 2008 07:55 PM

Lena

I think it is a very fine line to tread i.e. posting etc on behalf of a company. I would agree in principle with what you are saying but have found with encouragement the clients I have managed to start blogging have embraced it and not looked back.

Teach them to fish......

Peter

Posted by: Peter Gold at February 25, 2008 11:13 AM

@Peter:

I think if *employees* are posting on behalf of the company they work for, it's not a bad idea. The CEO isn't the only person who needs to be blogging...the fact that people think that is part of the problem.

And, knowledge transfer is the only way. Consultancies in this space aren't going to get far with stringing companies along.

-Lena

Posted by: Lena West at February 26, 2008 07:50 PM

Technology White Papers

 

InfoWorld Technology Marketplace

» Technology White Papers Library

Technology White Papers by Topic

Technology White Papers E-mail Alert

Find out when the latest white paper is available:
 
 
» BUY A LINK NOW

Sponsored Technology Links