<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">

<channel>
<title>Storage Adviser | Mario Apicella</title>
<link>http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/?source=rss</link>
<description></description>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator>mario_apicella&#64;infoworld&#46;com</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-04T03:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.17" />
<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<sy:updateBase>2000-01-01T12:00+00:00</sy:updateBase>

<item>
<title>Ironclad Windows backup on a budget</title>
<link>http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/07/ironclad_backup.html?source=rss</link>
<description>
Creating an effective backup for Windows is a challenge -- largely because the OS lacks a powerful, simple tool like Linux&apos;s dd, for example. However, there are many options for establishing a worthwhile backup system for Windows, some of which are free or rather inexpensive. I mention this because a friend -- I&apos;ll call her Laura -- recently asked for help setting up a backup system for her two Windows XP machines. A freelance writer by trade, Laura uses a desktop and a laptop, both of which are connected to a LAN and, via router, to the Internet. Laura had... &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/07/ironclad_backup.html?source=rss&quot;&gt; READ MORE&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; 
</description>
<guid>http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/07/ironclad_backup.html</guid>
<dc:subject>Data protection</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Mario Apicella</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-04T03:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Dell delivers eco-friendly SAS server for SMBs</title>
<link>http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/06/dell_new_sas_se.html?source=rss</link>
<description>
As the old saying goes, &quot;When you&apos;re holding a hammer, everything looks like a nail.&quot; For me, this means more than just seeing a storage angle everywhere I look. Lately, it also means seeing the environmental impact of every product I review. Both hammers -- storage and green tech -- saw a worthwhile nail in the PowerEdge T300, an entry-level server recently launched by Dell. Why both hammers? For starters, Dell &quot;gets&quot; storage. In a few short years, the company has moved from a bit player in the storage industry to one capable of holding down a prominent role. Don&apos;t... &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/06/dell_new_sas_se.html?source=rss&quot;&gt; READ MORE&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; 
</description>
<guid>http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/06/dell_new_sas_se.html</guid>
<dc:subject>SAS</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Mario Apicella</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-27T03:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Resilient storage requires worthwhile testing tools</title>
<link>http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/06/stress_testing.html?source=rss</link>
<description>
Taking the latest technologies for a test spin isn&apos;t my only reward as a reviewer. Learning how to use slick testing tools is a thrill all its own. Sometimes those two overlap -- which was the case recently when I put Cisco&apos;s new Nexus 5000 to the test using technology from Ixia, a vendor that specializes in IP testing. You may be wondering what storage has to do with IP testing. Well, let me set the stage. Cisco&apos;s Nexus 5000 is a revolutionary switch that implements Fibre Channel over Ethernet. FCoE, as I&apos;ve discussed before, shepherds Ethernet to never drop... &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/06/stress_testing.html?source=rss&quot;&gt; READ MORE&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; 
</description>
<guid>http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/06/stress_testing.html</guid>
<dc:subject>Protocols and Technologies</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Mario Apicella</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-20T03:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>How green is your provisioning?</title>
<link>http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/06/how_green_is_yo.html?source=rss</link>
<description>
Reaping the fat savings of thin provisioning may have gotten a little easier, as IBM this week announced new features for managing SVC (SAN Volume Controller). And depending on your strategy for implementing SVC&apos;s new thin-provisioning capabilities in your storage environment, the news could come with a green lining. As the acronym suggests, SVC is all about block virtualization. SVC boxes sit between hosts and storage arrays, allowing admins to carve logical volumes and present them to application servers over FC connections. In addition to provisioning, SVC offers the ability to create snapshots and volume replicas both locally and remotely.... &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/06/how_green_is_yo.html?source=rss&quot;&gt; READ MORE&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; 
</description>
<guid>http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/06/how_green_is_yo.html</guid>
<dc:subject>Thin provisioning</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Mario Apicella</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-13T03:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>SSDs: Perfect fit for mobile computing?</title>
<link>http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/06/ssd_for_mobile.html?source=rss</link>
<description>
There aren&apos;t many products I review that I can test for traveling. In fact, most are large enough for me to hide behind, if not inside. But the Lenovo ThinkPad T61 with a 64GB Samsung SSD (solid state drive) I am currently testing offered a rare opportunity to take my work with me on the road. Testing SSDs has given rise to some intriguing scenarios. For example, an imaginative person at memory solutions vendor Super Talent came up with the idea of using a paint shaker to put together a torture test scenario for SSDs (movie clip with ActiveX control).... &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/06/ssd_for_mobile.html?source=rss&quot;&gt; READ MORE&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; 
</description>
<guid>http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/06/ssd_for_mobile.html</guid>
<dc:subject>Solid State Drives</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Mario Apicella</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-06T03:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>On the fast track to tiered storage</title>
<link>http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/05/a_close_look_at.html?source=rss</link>
<description>
Companies leave data on primary silos well beyond the time when they should migrate it to a less expensive tier. This is one of the few truisms on which all storage vendors seem to agree. Of course, that agreement fades away when it comes time to define how to address the problem. Every vendor offers its own proprietary approach to facilitating allocation between storage tiers, and this variety poses one of the most formidable challenges storage administrators face as data volumes continue to increase drastically year after year. One approach that a number of vendors are taking is to inject... &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/05/a_close_look_at.html?source=rss&quot;&gt; READ MORE&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; 
</description>
<guid>http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/05/a_close_look_at.html</guid>
<dc:subject>Tiered Storage</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Mario Apicella</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-30T03:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>EMC&apos;s bold solid-state bet</title>
<link>http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/05/emc_bets_on_chi.html?source=rss</link>
<description>
Judging from the blogosphere&apos;s post-EMC World buzz, EMC&apos;s recent passion for SSDs (solid state drives) is no fly-by-night affair. In fact, at the event, which I was unable to attend, EMC suggested that by 2010, SSDs could reach price parity with, and eventually replace, FC (fibre channel) drives. EMC is showing more than a superficial interest in SSD -- quite surprising from a company that doesn&apos;t usually jump on new technologies (remember iSCSI or, better yet, RAID 6?) and, instead, waits for other vendors to taste how sharp the cutting edge is. In SSDs, EMC sees competitive advantage -- enough... &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/05/emc_bets_on_chi.html?source=rss&quot;&gt; READ MORE&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; 
</description>
<guid>http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/05/emc_bets_on_chi.html</guid>
<dc:subject>Solid State Drives</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Mario Apicella</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-23T03:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>An unblinking look at disaster recovery</title>
<link>http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/05/when_planning_f.html?source=rss</link>
<description>
I recently received a message in my inbox reminding me of the importance of disaster recovery: The Atlantic hurricane season begins on June 1 -- setting the stage for heavy losses and damage. ... Yet, most real-world problems -- while potentially devastating -- are much less spectacular. Unforeseen problems, like unidentified software bugs, can cause big problems when servers shut down or decentralized software fails. While I do agree that computer hiccups can be very disruptive, images from the terrible earthquake that recently hit China and those from the devastating cyclone that swept Myanmar put disaster recovery into grave perspective.... &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/05/when_planning_f.html?source=rss&quot;&gt; READ MORE&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; 
</description>
<guid>http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/05/when_planning_f.html</guid>
<dc:subject>Disaster Recovery</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Mario Apicella</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-16T03:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Solid-state upgrades: Risky business</title>
<link>http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/05/ssds_can_be_a_r.html?source=rss</link>
<description>
Hardware upgrades can be a blast. Slide 2GB more RAM in your machine and everything just works faster and smoother. Updating a laptop or desktop with an SSD (solid-state drive), however, can be tricky and not so rewarding, as I am finding. I haven&apos;t tested any enterprise-class SSDs yet, but I want to share some of my findings testing flash SSD devices on laptops and desktops. In short, your machines may not be able to keep up with the drives&apos; speed, and unfortunately there is no easy way to tell beforehand what will happen with your specific system. What I... &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/05/ssds_can_be_a_r.html?source=rss&quot;&gt; READ MORE&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; 
</description>
<guid>http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/05/ssds_can_be_a_r.html</guid>
<dc:subject>Solid State Drives</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Mario Apicella</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-09T03:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Storage that takes care of itself</title>
<link>http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/05/a_like_atrato.html?source=rss</link>
<description>
I&apos;ve said it before, but I&apos;ll say it again: SFF (small form factor) drives allow you to squeeze more spindles into the same rack space, giving you better performance in the same real estate. As an bonus, using 2.5-inch drives reduces the amount of electricity you use and creates less heat than using their larger cousins, essentially making your storage array less demanding on your wallet and on the electric grid. Naysayers will object that SFF drives cannot compete when capacity is the main objective. True, with a maximum capacity of 500GB, SFF drives deliver half of what 3.5-inch drives... &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/05/a_like_atrato.html?source=rss&quot;&gt; READ MORE&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; 
</description>
<guid>http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/05/a_like_atrato.html</guid>
<dc:subject>Small form factor drives</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Mario Apicella</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-02T03:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>An interview with the real McCoy</title>
<link>http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/04/an_interview_wi.html?source=rss</link>
<description>
There is a growing appetite for&amp;#160; storage performance in the data center&amp;#160; that old fashioned disk drives don&apos;t seem to be able to satisfy. Solid state drives are becoming the new stars of performance hungry applications, but with so many vendors and no unifying&amp;#160; product standard&amp;#160; is there a common ground for those drives? In an exclusive e-mail interview with Jim McCoy, chairman of Pliant Technology, a new company that will soon begin shipping their own SSD products, we try to find an answer to that question.&amp;#160; InfoWorld: What is Pliant Technology? McCoy: Pliant Technology is developing a new class... &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/04/an_interview_wi.html?source=rss&quot;&gt; READ MORE&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; 
</description>
<guid>http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/04/an_interview_wi.html</guid>
<dc:subject>Solid State Drives</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Mario Apicella</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28T03:00:30-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>No easy green strategy for storage</title>
<link>http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/04/no_easy_green_s.html?source=rss</link>
<description>
I find it ironic that Seagate chose Earth Day to celebrate the shipment of its billionth disk drive. After all, increased drive dependency in the datacenter is fast transforming into an unsustainable energy demand. Of course, the blame does not fall entirely on drive vendors. For the most part, they are simply responding to opportunity. But this Earth Day billionth-drive milestone can&apos;t help but remind me of oil companies feasting on record profits while consumers struggle with high prices at the pump. Think I&apos;m exaggerating the environmental impact of the electricity used in the datacenter? Consider this: According to an... &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/04/no_easy_green_s.html?source=rss&quot;&gt; READ MORE&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; 
</description>
<guid>http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/04/no_easy_green_s.html</guid>
<dc:subject>Green Storage</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Mario Apicella</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-25T03:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Smart array may signal storage shift</title>
<link>http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/04/xiotech_packs_d.html?source=rss</link>
<description>
Although you often find statements that seem critical of disk drives in this column, I never criticize disk drives per se, but rather how we use them. As of late, I&apos;ve been interested in the innovative use of disk drives in storage arrays. The latest news from Xiotech fits right into this discussion, providing further proof that the storage industry is fast turning evolution into revolution in rethinking its approach to disk drives. [ For recent disk drive commentary, see &quot;Upgrading to solid state,&quot; &quot;Time to bury big-drive &apos;diskosaurs&apos;,&quot; and &quot;Diskosaurs bite back.&quot; ] As you may have read, Xiotech... &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/04/xiotech_packs_d.html?source=rss&quot;&gt; READ MORE&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; 
</description>
<guid>http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/04/xiotech_packs_d.html</guid>
<dc:subject>Protocols and Technologies</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Mario Apicella</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-18T03:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>FCoE catches fire at SNW</title>
<link>http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/04/fcoe_is_shippin.html?source=rss</link>
<description>
Storage Networking World came and went this week, and judging from the hype, FCoE (Fibre Channel over Ethernet) is coming out of the conference with a head full of steam. Understandably so, I may add, because this technology, which only a year ago was little more than a jot on a napkin, is poised to make its mark on the storage market. Of course, running FC transport over Ethernet has never been impossible from a technical perspective. Politics, as this rather animated discussion proves, have played a large role in ensuring the two technologies have grown up in isolation. Fast-forward... &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/04/fcoe_is_shippin.html?source=rss&quot;&gt; READ MORE&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; 
</description>
<guid>http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/04/fcoe_is_shippin.html</guid>
<dc:subject>Protocols and Technologies</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Mario Apicella</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-11T03:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>&quot;Diskosaurs&quot; bite back</title>
<link>http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/04/the_diskosaurs.html?source=rss</link>
<description>
In last week&apos;s Storage Adviser, I argued in favor of reducing your enterprise storage footprint, championing the energy and space consumption benefits of replacing 3.5-inch &quot;diskosaurs&quot; with SFF (small form factor) drives. Well, it appears the diskosaurs are biting back, as four Seagate 1TB Barracuda ES.2 drives landed in my lab. The 3.5-inch drives, which Seagate will make available next week, are packed with features that remind you why large-form-factor drives still have a significant role to play when capacity and manufacturing flexibility are the major concerns. The new large Barracuda Similarly to other members of the family, this new... &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/04/the_diskosaurs.html?source=rss&quot;&gt; READ MORE&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; 
</description>
<guid>http://weblog.infoworld.com/storageadviser/archives/2008/04/the_diskosaurs.html</guid>
<dc:subject>Small form factor drives</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Mario Apicella</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-04T03:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>
