- "Diskosaurs" bite back
- Time to bury big-drive "diskosaurs"
- Upgrading to solid state
- Infiniband: Back from the dead again?
- Sleeping laptops leave encryption at risk
- The death knell for RAID?
- Virtualizing the whole shebang
- A new focus on storage advice
- Storage Sprawl Podcast: Closing doors to data
- Storage Sprawl Podcast: The new 'dispersed storage' model
March 21, 2008 | Comments: (0)
Upgrading to solid state
Now that loose SSDs (solid state drives) are available, you may be wondering how best to take advantage of the technology. Here's a breakdown of where retrofitting current machines with solid state could reap worthwhile rewards.
Imation, one of the first vendors to market loose SSDs, is currently offering two SSD lines. One, a 2.5-inch drive with either 16GB or 32GB capacity; the other, a 3.5-inch device that stores up to 64GB. Both offer SATA connectivity.
Of the two offerings, the 2.5-inch format finds a natural home in laptops, allowing you to exploit one of solid state's major advantages over spinning devices: shock resistance.
Travel, as you know, takes its toll on laptops; just the right bump could easily damage a delicate spinning drive -- especially while in operation. To wit, Seagate's Momentus drives can withstand a shock of 900G for 2 milliseconds when idle, but only 300G for 1 millisecond when the drive is spinning, according to the company. So, if a beverage cart bumps you in the elbow while you are working, you are at greater risk of drive damage. Retrofitting with an SSD will mean your laptop will be less susceptible to drive damage.
As for the 3.5-inch format, which Imation sent me, laptop retrofitting is out of the question. Instead, outfitting a server or workstation with one of these loose SSDs will allow you to tap solid state's second major advantage: speed.
According to Imation, its Pro 7000 can sustain 81,000 IOPS when doing sequential reads, and it can transfer data as fast as 120MBps -- which sounds impressive but must be carefully compared with what spinning drives can do, considering the higher price of SSD drives.
Which is considerable.
A quick search on the Web shows that the 64GB Imation Pro 7000 sells for about $2,000, whereas a 16GB model can be purchased for around $900. As more vendors start offering these devices, these prices will go down significantly, but until then, careful planning is essential, as purchasing the minimum capacity necessary can save a bundle.
Without actual testing, however, it is difficult to reach a conclusion regarding the price/performance ratio of these drives. I will be running performance tests in the near future, with the intention of comparing the results with those of conventional drives. One such drive, the Western Digital Raptor, offers a similar capacity (74GB) and a SATA interface, allowing it to be connected to the same controller. From previous reviews, I know that the Raptor, which spins at 10,000 RPM, is an exceptionally fast drive, and should offer a worthwhile point of comparison for the Pro 7000.
While I'm running those benchmarks, consider this: Disk-to-disk backups can cut backup windows significantly over tape. However, disk-to-disk does not solve the problem of moving a copy to an outside vault in a satisfactory fashion. Because removable drives are susceptible to damage in transport, you still have to use tape. Drop a drive, and your backup is history. By contrast, the Pro 7000, being solid state, opens up the possibility of safely using disk drives to move backups off-site. I dropped my test drive from six feet over a concrete floor, and it's still working without problems.
Try that with a spinning drive.
Posted by Mario Apicella on March 21, 2008 03:00 AM
RATE THIS ARTICLE:
-

- COMMENTS
2000 $ just for Hard Drive,
Forget it I can buy top of the line
Hi Def TV for that much money.
Not worth it.
On the other hand, television sets have historically proven to be quite unreliable regarding data storage and transport.
Posted by: dbiebers at March 24, 2008 11:39 AMwas interested in comment though on damaging drives that were used in disk to disk by dropping them, your comment was your backup is toast.
Over the past couple of years we have been moving our customers from our previous standard of using some backup program (Backup Exec (BE), etc.) to do backups to tape with tapes being moved offsite to a different style of backup. I use style because it's the same sort of thing just done differently. We now use two backup programs, Backup Exec and Backup Exec System Restore (BESR) and backup only to HDs. BE is used to do the traditional backup but does it to a removable HDs (we use Sans Digitals MS1UT drive bays with standard SATA drives in a removable tray), the drives are taken offsite on a scheduled determined by the client, we use up to 14 different drives in a rotation just like we used to with tapes. BESR image backups are done to another 750GB drive that is internal to the server. Once a month we make a copy of that drive to an external 750GB that is also in an MS1UT drive bay.
We have found that the external drives are much cheaper to buy initially. Can be easily upgraded when necessary with the existing drives used in workstations for backups there. If one of the drives is damaged replacements can be obtained at your local computer store if needed and at worst you have lost a days backup and they are faster than doing a tape backup. Also since tape drives only seem to last 2 to 3 years at most before needing to be repaired or replaced we avoid that cost as well.
For small businesses (under 50 computers) it's a very cost effective option.
Posted by: PeterMac at March 24, 2008 01:57 PM| STORAGE SPRAWL PODCAST |
| Listen to the latest podcast: |
| MP3 • RSS • Get Podcast • Archive • Mobilize |
TOP STORIES
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

- Network Storage: Patterns, Trends & Business Needs
- Application Security: Threats and How to Counter Them
- Remote Access: Maintain Security and Decrease the Burden on IT

- Disaster Recovery in Minutes
- Reduce Recovery Times and Tape Costs
- Secure, recover, and archive critical information





