Free Newsletters

   All InfoWorld Newsletters
Strategic Developer | Martin Heller » Wireless Security: How much is enough?

April 04, 2007 | Comments: (0)

Wireless Security: How much is enough?

The first couple of wireless routers I set up for my home and office networks, several years ago, came wide open: that is, they were preset at the factory to a common SSID with broadcast enabled, no encryption, and no MAC authentication. The point was that they'd work out of the box for a non-technical user.

That might be fine if you want your neighbors and any passers-by to be able to use your Internet connection, as long as you have all the computers on your network secured, and you don't care about the legal consequences of others doing things on the Internet that could only be traced back to your router. It's not really fine, though, because the courts have not been kind to the owners of open wireless routers that have been used for illegal purposes, such as transmitting child pornography.

I initially set my own routers to use WEP encryption with a pre-shared pass phrase, which was the best they could do; later, after applying patches to the routers's firmware, I switched them to the more secure WPA encryption scheme with a pre-shared pass phrase, since by then WEP had been cracked. If I had a bigger network, I would have used 802.1x authentication instead of a pre-shared key.

Recently, Verizon upgraded my home wireless router to an Actiontec MI424WR. I was pleased to note that it came preconfigured to have some security: it came with WEP encryption turned on, and the preconfigured randomized SSID and WEP key printed on a label underneath the router. It also came pre-configured for medium firewall security.

Of course, I reconfigured the router to use my usual WPA encryption scheme with a pre-shared pass phrase. I also changed the supplied random SSID to my own SSID, so that computers I had already authorized to use my home network would still have access.

Should I be limiting access to specific MAC addresses? Should I turn off SSID broadcasting? Are there other measures that make practical sense? Or have I already done enough to secure my wireless networks?

Posted by Martin Heller on April 4, 2007 06:00 AM


RATE THIS ARTICLE:





 

  •  
  • COMMENTS




Martin,
Keep in mind what you are trying to secure. Do you really need the "million dollar fence" for your home wireless network? Unless you are protecting the Crown Jewels, probably not. For most home-users living in suburbia you can probably get away with WPA2 and AES.

The days of cloaking your SSID & MAC filtering as good additional layers are quickly passing us bye. The knowledge to exploitation curve has come to a point where these two options are becoming waste of time. But to practice good Defense in Depth, MAC filtering is not going to hurt you. If you're only maintaining a couple of devices, I'd say go for it.

Posted by: Nick Krasny at April 4, 2007 08:48 AM

MAC Filtering is not practical on this router, as it can only hold 10 MAC addresses at a time. If you have any more you have to choose what can be only at any given time. You should complain to Verizon about this technical limitation. The d-link they supplied me with before had no problems with many MAC addresses and Verizon sets the spec for the firmware so it is their problem to fix.

Posted by: Eric at February 5, 2008 09:52 AM

Technology White Papers

 

InfoWorld Technology Marketplace

» Technology White Papers Library

Technology White Papers by Topic

Technology White Papers E-mail Alert

Find out when the latest white paper is available:
 
 
» BUY A LINK NOW

Sponsored Technology Links