- Apple fights NYC over green apple logo
- IBM combines Systems i and p into greener Power System
- Harnessing datacenter heat for savings
- Event: Uptime, IT heavyweights to tackle data center power crisis
- The ROI of green IT
- Feds devise program to help datacenter operators cut energy waste, costs
- Xerox develops Sustainability Calculator for doc tech
- Carbon-measuring software evolves
- Greenpeace adding energy-consumption criteria to green rankings
- Make IT accountable for tech-related power bills
November 01, 2007 | Comments: (0)
IBM enters the energy efficient credit game
Big Blue today is launching the IBM Efficiency Certificates initiative, a program through which companies can earn certified energy efficiency credits (EECs) for reducing power consumption in the datacenter. Also known as white tags, EECs can serve as proof to investors of a company's energy-saving efforts -- or as a source of income when sold on the burgeoning white-tag market.
As part of the initiative, IBM has partnered with Neuwing Energy, a verifier of energy efficiency projects and marketer of EECs. Neuwing will first determine the initial energy draw from an IBM client's existing datacenter or IT equipment identified for consolidation using industry-accepted energy estimates. IBM will then work with the client to implement energy-saving projects, such as server consolidation through virtualization. After the project is complete, Neuwing will perform a second review of the energy draw and calculate the efficiency improvement in terms of megawatt hours saved. In turn, IBM will issue energy efficiency certificates representing those savings.
It's clear how Neuwing and IBM would respectively benefit from this initiative: The client company pays Neuwing for the assessment and certification. IBM profits by providing consulting services and equipment to the customers to achieve energy savings. But what's the value to a company in amassing EECs?
According to Rich Lechner, IBM's vice president of IT optimization, there are two primary benefits. First, more investors and shareholders are looking to companies to reduce their environmental impact. Saving energy has that very outcome. Thus, certificate bearers can show off their credits as proof of their efforts. As an added bonus, these kinds of credits could appeal to the financial sensibilities of investors, because they represent cost savings.
Second, Lechner says there's a growing market. Connecticut implemented a white tag standard this year; Nevada and Pennsylvania have adopted legislation requiring white tags as part of a mandated state portfolio standard. There are also markets in Europe. White-tag buyers include electric utilities mandated to cap power consumption, as well as organizations unable to meet established greenhouse gas emission goals.
"Since the recent emergence of energy efficiency certificates as a market, we have seen market volume quickly grow into the millions of megawatt-hours and expect the energy efficiency market to surpass the renewable energy certificates market in a couple of years," said Matthew Rosenblum, executive vice president and CFO of Neuwing.
In a way, saved megawatt hours is a rival metric to carbon emissions. Many companies are working to measure their carbon footprints and report improvements from year to year. Moreover, they're purchasing carbon offsets to compensate for their own CO2 emissions. But Lechner argues that measuring megawatt hours is "less fuzzy" than measuring CO2s. That is, it's relatively easy to take a piece of IT equipment and measure at the wall how many watts it consumes. The same can't be said for carbon and other GHGs.
IBM Efficiency Certificates will first be available in the United States and expand to Europe in 2008.
Posted by Ted Samson on November 1, 2007 09:01 PM
RATE THIS ARTICLE:
-

- COMMENTS
How many credits does IBM have? That's the first place they should start.
Posted by: GeorgeC at November 3, 2007 01:16 PMI do not like carbon certificates.
You have to change technology, not billing. Energy cannot augment like interests, but money does.
The difference is, that societies have to be forced to change the whole process of production, with certificates you will avoid any big changes, you just buy some cheep forests in the world and then you are off. This is not ok. This is much too cheep regarding the consequences.
I would force IBM to purchase renewable energy to foster new technologies. Interests can grow mathematically endless.
Do not try this in Europe!
regards,
Stephan Schildberg,
ecologee.net
I do not agree with a CO2 certification strategy.
This solves not the challenge, because certificates will be bought with the revenue of each enterprise, theoretically with interests, which do not grow on trees, but grow unnaturally fast. They cannot be part of nature, this does not work.
Only a technologically change with renewable energies and sustainable materials could be a roud to the solution.
I would rather advise to invest in decentralized power plants running on independent energy sources for all IBM sites.
Stephan Schildberg,
ecologee.net - The Internet with renewable energies.
TOP STORIES
Sun to clarify JavaFX planMS's dev tool service packs
HP in talks to buy EDS
Developers' role shifting
MS: XP SP3 reboots OEMs' fault
Apple: iPhone out of stock
Can Sun rejuvenate Java?
Powerset unveils Google-killer
FBI worried about Cisco gear
AMD updates quad-core Opterons
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

- Virtualization: A Step by Step Approach to Success
- Dialing up Agility with Business Transformation
- 5 Things You Need to Know About Storage Virtualization

- Is your smaller organization ready for High Availability?
- Is system maintenance doing more harm than good?
- Virtual Test Lab Automation: Manage development infrastructure





