Wouldn't it have shown just a tad bit of professionalism to spell the word "governor" correctly instead of rhyming with Terminator?

The Los Angeles Times, which has shown a tendency to really dislike him, spelled it properly. (I am just tired of the movie jokes and Schwartzenegger has smartened up and toned his movie persona way down.)

No surprise. We should never confuse activity with action. While there has been much activity around cybersecurity in the past five years, there has been in government, and especially in state and local government, woefully little meaningful action to improve security.

Sadly, most of the security activities have been centered around gathering and maintaining political power for an agenda contrary to the majority of Amercians beliefs and needs, and not on action towards specific meaningful objectives.

As one European observer put it, "It appears that the Republicans know how to get elected, but once there can't govern, and the Democrats know how to govern, but not how to get elected."

I found the governator comment cute for the title and very unprofessional for the text. I see editorial values are in decline - I expect more from Infoworld.

Actually, the Los Angeles times got the wrong movie. Wire tapping and conspiracy happened in "Total Recall" not the "Terminator".