Free Newsletters

   All InfoWorld Newsletters
Tech Watch | InfoWorld Staff » CA drives home hands-free cell law

September 15, 2006 | Comments: (0)

CA drives home hands-free cell law

Take note California SUV-drivers with cell phone-clad cheeks: Hands-free kits as mandatory for all but commercial drivers may soon become law, with a bill expected to be signed by the Governator on Friday.

Never mind that the fine, $20, is a the cost of driving a few extra miles in a Hummer or Escalade -- it's the law starting in 2008.

Imagine it: city pedestrians crossing safely and suburban drivers dreaming of a day when a wave-in for lane change beats the old speed-up. But the editors of the San Francisco Chronicle, known for their wisdom, say it is a highlight of the legal hooey coming out of Sacramento -- no research to support it, they say.

Really? Tell that to someone who has not been cut-off on the road or nearly run over as a pedestrian by the cell phone-driver set, or to those who have talked back to us on The Ten Commandments of cell phone etiquette.

Oh, and the authors of this study: Cell Phone-Induced Failures of Visual Attention During Simulated Driving (a PDF file).

Reports say Sprint-Nextel was the only carrier to not support the bill. Hello? Hands-free market anyone? PalmOne PR wrote InfoWorld today to say how enthusiastic the company was of the bill:

California's largest producer of cell phones, Palm is the first and only cell-phone manufacturer to publicly support the bill. The company believes that SB-1613 responsibly addresses evidence that handheld cell-phone use increases the risk of accidents. Palm also believes that while this bill is not the first in the United States, its passage in California could be instrumental in leading other states to follow suit and improve driving safety.

"With the technology available today, there is no reason for a driver to be holding a cell phone while behind the wheel," said Mary Doyle, senior vice president and general counsel at Palm. "Headset technology, both wired and wireless, is readily available, and call quality using a hands-free headset is generally excellent. With our Treo smartphones, Palm gives drivers numerous options for helping keep their eyes on the road and two hands on the wheel, focusing first and foremost on driving."


Posted by Mike Barton on September 15, 2006 10:58 AM


RATE THIS ARTICLE:





 

  •  
  • COMMENTS




I think a bigger issue is the use of email and the internet from smart-phones and blackberries. As an admitted sinner I find this far more distractive than "just" holding the phone while talking - at least you can keep your eyes on the road (while you don't read the daily newspaper...)

I wonder what PalmOne approach to that is...

Posted by: Nachman at September 15, 2006 12:50 PM

The problem with this law, and laws like it, is that it completely misses the point. It's not *holding* a cell phone that's the problem, unless you drive a stick shift... it's *being engaged in a conversation* that takes your attention off the road. This can happen whether you're holding the phone next to your ear, or talking on a headset.

If legislators want to *really* make some effective changes, they should ban talking on a cell phone while driving *period*. Otherwise, they are simply bypassing the problem and opening the floodgates for the carriers to mass-market headsets, not making the roads safer.

Posted by: Arden at September 15, 2006 06:25 PM

This hands-free stuff is really just a sop to take our minds off the bigger issue.

The primary problem with talking on the cell phone while driving is that your attention isn't on the road. Your attention is focused on the conversation you are having. You can't have a meaningful conversation without paying attention!

People aren't computers. Computers can task switch in fantastically short periods of time. Nowadays, even true multiprocessing is widely available. However people require something like 3 seconds to switch attention from one context to another.

Numerous studies have shown that hands-free sets only slightly improve safety on the road. If you want to be safe on the road, quit talking while you are driving. Pull over.

Posted by: Brian at September 18, 2006 02:27 PM

I think people just need to stop, slow down and relax. What is so important all the time that three or four things need to be completed at once, at all times of the day. I am a full time mom and a part time high tech professional, I'm pretty busy. Having said that, the only time that life shows up is right now...and there is no reason to do twenty things at once. Relax.

Posted by: Kelly at January 1, 2007 08:45 PM

It amazes me the way everybody knows how everybody should do things. It is small minded narrow thinking that makes people lump everyone into a group. There are many things that can distract a driver. Such a a person in the passanger seat who wants to have a stimulating conversation.Daaaa how do we all get so opinionated and self rightious. Note that most all opinions on the subject of driving and talking on the phone are people talking about the other guy!!! Is it possible that they cut in front of you because they are selfish and don't pay attention to anybody on the road. Don't think taking a phone out of our hands is gonna make us better drivers. We we all need is to just be better people. That includes myself. Because I too get into the it is all about me syndrom.

Posted by: Terri at January 11, 2007 01:53 PM

I have been run off the road or nearly hit by 4 people this year alone... they areholding cell phones to thier left ear so they don't turn thier head all the way as to not lose connection with thier ear. I drive one of those SUV crossovers so it's not like I'm hard to see.

Just as dangerous is the person driving 40 on the freeway because they are having a robust converstation and evidently can't pay enough attention to the road.

I ride a motorcycle...no cell phone...no radio. So I see alot.

I agree about banning drivers on cell phones but with handsfree you can't tell if the driver is singing, talking to themsleves, or talking on a phone. Handsfree won't be perfect but hopefully people will turn thier heads more often without the phone to thier ear.

Posted by: Bev at May 24, 2007 03:17 PM

Once again everyone fails to SEE
that it's still all about MONEY.

More money for the STATE.
Cops need money too so don't HATE.
And Cell Phone companies can keep their CONGLOMERATE.

Posted by: Chris at June 21, 2007 04:28 PM

Are there any reports to confirm that more accidents are caused by cell phone usage in comparison to those that are not on cell phones. I have been rear ended in two car accidents in the last 10 years and neither of the drivers were on cell phones. There are several distractions that a driver encounters what about when you have a passenger in the car that you are talking to? What about the mother who has children in the car that are screaming, crying, fighting. What is the violation for men shaving while driving, women applying make up and lets not forget the ones reading a novel! Bottom line we all have to be defensive drivers and watch out for the person who is not paying attention for whatever reason.

Posted by: SG at June 22, 2007 08:15 AM

This solution could possibly be just a band aid for the true problem of being distracted from operating a vehicle. But by forcing people to use a hands free unit, I believe it is a positive step. I drive a manual transmission car and when I use the headset, I have noticed a huge difference in how I handle the vehicle. I feel more in control, even while on the phone. But I agree, don't answer unless you absolutely need to and even then, do you(I) really need to?

Posted by: JJ at July 3, 2007 03:37 PM

America has unfortunately become immune to the fact that distractions cause accidents. In such a self-seeking, narcissistic society where "only what I am doing right now matters to the whole world" type thinking we should be anything but shocked that this is where society has turned. However, if we illegalize cell phones we must also illegalize bill boards, waving to friends we pass on the road, dogs on the loose, (feel free to fill in the blank). Law books would be (and are becoming) massive due to the legislation of issues that should be discretionary. The problem is each of us tends to think of ourselves more than others. Unfortunately, it will take only one fatal accident to teach the lesson. Also unfortunately you only get one fatal accident if you are the victim. Even then, I'm not so sure the little habit monster won't have had his way already to the place of returning even after such a horrific lesson. There is a principle involved.
On an ending note...the only reason the law has a hands-free provision is because holding a cell phone is the only way a cop can determine that you are on a cell phone call. Otherwise you could be singing or talking to yourself.

Posted by: Chad Hammond at July 12, 2007 02:41 PM

The Governator just signed another bill in California called SB33. This new law bans drivers under 18 from using any type of wireless device while driving, inculding hands-free devices.

This law goes into effect on July 1st, 2008 the same time as Senate Bill 1613, California's Hands-Free Law.

Agreed that these are just band-aids, but I have a hard time thinking were going to be worse off when these two laws go into effect.

Posted by: Steve Thomas at September 18, 2007 12:56 PM

Technology White Papers

 

InfoWorld Technology Marketplace

» Technology White Papers Library

Technology White Papers by Topic

Technology White Papers E-mail Alert

Find out when the latest white paper is available:
 
 
» BUY A LINK NOW

Sponsored Technology Links