Free Newsletters
Technology & Business Daily

InfoWorld
Log-in | Register

  Wednesday, December 10, 2003 

Adam Bosworth on navigating the linked web of data

Here's a brief clip from Adam Bosworth's terrific keynote, in which he talks about the synchronizing data browser that he's been dropping hints about on his weblog, and in which he also pokes some friendly fun at Jean Paoli's French accent.

It's always interesting to see which memes emerge from conferences. I'm delighted that the ideas in the air at this one resonate very strongly with the theme of my own keynote: how and why to make the ways we humans search, navigate, and interact with linked sets of documents a central aspect of the evolving fabric of XML services. Dave Megginson's "strange creations," Adobe's demonstration yesterday of its forthcoming designer (which I think of as "InfoPath for digital paper"), Mike Champion's level-headed assessment of how Amazon and eBay are exploiting plain XML-over-HTTP, the WSRP interop session I'll attend later, and of course Adam's talk -- all in all I'm feeling pretty good about where things are headed.

 

Mike Champion on Web services reference architecture

Mike Champion is Software AG's representative to the W3C's Web Services Architecture working group. I'm in his talk right now on how "the disparate pieces of the Web services technology space - messaging, description, choreography, security, management, etc. - fit together in a reference architecture." In this clip, Mike talks about four overall impressions. First, that it's been harder than expected to arrive at an understanding of basic terms and concepts. Second, that the relationship between the services Web and the plain old Web has proved more controversial than anyone would have guessed. Third, that while the semantic Web is regarded by many as "pie in the sky," the need to broker some kind of semantic understanding across business processes is front and center. Fourth, that hammering out consensus in an environment where vendors hotly contest their interests has been...challenging.

He concludes that the group has not, as yet, made satisfactory progress toward defining a "canonical stack" -- such efforts are "somewhere between challenging and hopeless. The acronym SOAP, for example, is no longer an acronym for anything." But there are two reference architectures that correspond to different expansions of SOAP. The original, Simple Object Access Protocol, implies distributed objects made easy for programmers. The other way, Service Oriented Architecture protocol, is more abstract, not as amenable to automated tools, but "is a more powerful idea. RESTful applications are special cases of that architecture." I like how he sums this up: REST and RPC aren't (or shouldn't be) ideologies, they're tools in an engineering toolkit to be used as and when appropriate. Agreed.

As it reaches the end of its chartered lifetime, the group has no plan to re-charter in its current form. It acknowledges, he says, that the real focus of Web services standardization now lies with OASIS and the WS-I.

Update: Note to self: using the EMBED tag is a bad idea. It gets confusing when multiple video streams start playing in the aggregator, or on the Web page.

 


Recent Entries


















































Sponsored Technology Links

 
 
 HOME  NEWS  BLOGS  PODCASTS  VIDEOS  TECHNOLOGIES  TEST CENTER  EVENTS  CAREERS   About | Advertise | Awards | RSS | Contact Us 

Copyright © 2008, Reprints, Permissions, Licensing, IDG Network, Privacy Policy, Terms of Service.
All Rights reserved. InfoWorld is a leading publisher of technology information and product reviews on topics including viruses,
phishing, worms, firewalls, security, servers, storage, networking, wireless, databases, and web services.

CIO :: ComputerWorld :: CSO :: Demo :: GamePro :: Games.net :: IDG Connect :: IDG World Expo
Industry Standard :: IT World :: JavaWorld :: LinuxWorld :: MacUser :: Macworld :: Network World :: PC World :: Playlist