Free Newsletters

   All InfoWorld Newsletters
Ahead of the Curve | Tom Yager » PCs approach Mac simplicity, courtesy of AMD

March 04, 2008 | Comments: (0)

PCs approach Mac simplicity, courtesy of AMD

It takes a chipmaker to make PCs as easy to set up and operate as Macs, and AMD's going to do it

If the reality of the "standardized PC" were aligned with the rhetoric, no PC would ship with a separate driver disc. Windows XP would install onto a blank hard drive in the time it takes to copy the files. There would be no Found New Hardware Wizard, and if you inherited a PC with no discs or documentation, you could be certain that a store-bought Windows Vista DVD would be the only thing you'd need to make it work.

AMD, Vista, Mac
That's the reality for every modern-era Mac. A used Mac, plus nothing but a generic copy of Leopard, is a working computer. On that Mac's first connection to the Internet, all of that specific model's latest device drivers and firmware are downloaded and installed in one hands-off operation. Surely, if someone were given a chance to lay out the requirements for a PC standard from scratch, this sort of simplicity would be among them.

PC users can have computers that install from scratch with generic Vista or Windows media. If you knew that essential device drivers were on all Microsoft's install discs, and that all system drivers could be updated any time with a single download, that'd feel more like the sort of standard you'd expect. I was pleased to find that a major piece of the bridge to this future recently fell into place.

I just took delivery on a box containing a reference system for AMD's new Cartwheel (780G series) desktop platform. Inside an unnecessarily large, black, desk-side chassis was a system built around a very green (2.5GHz, 45 watt) dual-core AMD Athlon X2 4800 CPU. This system is what I now demand all desktops to be when I'm not racing them: Silent. But to my point about standard platforms: All systems built on AMD's Cartwheel, regardless of vendor, will use an identical bundle of device drivers for CPU, core logic, internal and external SATA disk controller, RAID, Ethernet, multi-display 3-D accelerated graphics (DirectX 10 compatible), DVD/Blu-Ray/HD-DVD decoding, and USB 2.0. Any system based on Cartwheel runs Vista out of the box with the drivers Microsoft put on the disc, and runs fully optimized after one trip to AMD's Web site to download the latest driver bundle.

The problem with most attempts at platforms is that they are inflexible. For example, Intel can claim that its chipsets' benefits overlap with AMD's, but Intel's chipset-integrated graphics are barely adequate for text, much less 3-D. AMD played the trump card of engineers from graphics chipmaker ATI, so that even the least of the Cartwheel desktops will still be able to play HD and Blu-Ray DVDs, along with HD content, games, and, oh yes, Vista. While Cartwheel will get this done and establish lower price points doing it, it has another advantage that Intel lacks. For those users and system makers wanting more 3-D kick from Cartwheel than the 780G integrated graphics provide, AMD offers the unique option of Hybrid Graphics: You can add an AMD/ATI discrete 3-D graphics accelerator, ranging in power and price from bargain bin to barnburner, to your system, and when running Vista, Cartwheel systems will use the combined rendering power of integrated and discrete GPUs (graphics processing units). Even with Hybrid Graphics, the platform still uses one set of drivers common to all implementations, downloadable from AMD.

The Cartwheel desktop platform will have a Puma counterpart for notebooks, extending the reach of AMD's consistent, unified PC platform to all clients. Is this certain to carry buyers of AMD 780G systems toward Mac-like simplicity? There are a couple of major bumps in that road. One is the BIOS. Each PC maker contracts out the initial and continued development of its systems' boot firmware and arranges distribution to customers. As long as a user can be cornered into having to flash his PC's BIOS to get an OS loaded, no PC can claim to be as easy to deploy as a Mac. The other limitation is audio. Audio is not part of the Cartwheel/Puma platform, so neither AMD nor users can predict which one of many digital audio chips their system will use. Audio drivers are often missing from Windows install discs, forcing you to find them on vendor-supplied media or on the vendor's Web site.

I can still see a day when an AMD platform-based PC will boot from a Microsoft install disc, connect to AMD.com, automatically identify and download the latest unified drivers, and come to life as a fully optimized PC, all without the user's intervention. That's as it should be, and as I've said, I think that AMD is the only outfit that could pull this off. Until then, customers who buy AMD 780G platforms from whatever system makers they choose will find that their CPU, core logic (chipset), and graphics device drivers are developed and maintained by, and downloadable from, AMD. That is a major step forward.

Posted by Tom Yager on March 4, 2008 06:17 PM


RATE THIS ARTICLE:





 

  •  
  • COMMENTS




George Ou sends his regards.

When will you stop being AMD's number 1 fanboy?

I must say your articles are nothing short of AMD propaganda.

May George Ou have mercy on your soul.

Posted by: Tom, Tom, Tom at March 4, 2008 07:40 PM

Yes you may be correct but the number of devices for a Mac vs. PC is much lower. So no more of the exciting fun that you have now with the PC if it were to come to this, and forget competition.

Posted by: Josh at March 5, 2008 05:14 AM

As a Mac user, and a PC admin and user, I have to say this is way, way off. Being able to download something off a web site is in no ways similar to the ease of use of a Mac. Its not even close... If the PC automatically downloaded the drivers it needed, in the back-ground, and then prompted the user to install them - then you're beginning to approach Mac installation simplicity. But installing a PC is just the beginning, its using it that is so frustrating for most non-techie end users. I enjoy my PC, but it takes a lot of time to set up correctly. Its non-intuitive, and likes to be in front. A Mac is a beautiful tool, and the one I prefer. It jettisons so much unnecessary fluff in favor of simplicity (for the most part), which enhances productivity for 95% of us. The other 5% can download Linux and play with it (I prefer Ubuntu myself).

No, this doesn't even come close to making a PC approach Mac simplicity.

Posted by: Thor Ryan at March 5, 2008 12:28 PM

So, your point with this article??? i think that there are a lot of people out there that like challenges and more when it comes with a PC, i love challenges so that's why i have installed Leopard on my toshiba satellite and it's hard but it pays off.

Posted by: Carlos at March 5, 2008 04:22 PM

But still PC's can't be Macs.

Posted by: sachin at March 6, 2008 12:39 AM

I may be an AMD fan, but I have to agree with Tom Tom Tom, articles like this are little more than regurgitated press releases. Please come back when you have actual experience using the platform and can report on how close reality matches the promise.

Posted by: AMD Fan at March 6, 2008 10:48 AM

This would make running other OS's like Linux on the box in a standard way possible too!

Posted by: dagny gromer at March 6, 2008 10:52 AM

Tom, next time you are tight on deadline at least come up with some drivel that is interesting to read. Don't just pound some useless words out on the ol' MBP on a red-eye back from the AMD launch party.

Posted by: Mike at March 7, 2008 09:05 AM

As an IT manager, I appreciate being informed of a system like this. Our firm will definitely look in to these systems based in part on this article. I'm always looking at ways to solve the headache and overhead associated with lots of different device drivers.

Posted by: Chad M at March 7, 2008 12:07 PM

Exactly how is this different from any of several vendors enterprise oriented PC's?

They make a standardized product, target stable features, reliable operation, and de-emphasize bleeding edge products and price points. They come pre-loaded with (typically Windows) and come with a one-decision restore disk.

Tom betrays his leanings when he talks about updating the drivers. If you really want simplicity, you never update the drivers, unless Windows Update/SUS/WSUS offers to do it for you. Maybe not even then.

Posted by: Brian at March 11, 2008 04:33 PM

I have a couple of things to say.

Aside the AMD propaganda that you are spewing here, what's the innovation factor here?

AMD can't afford to build multiple differentiated platform SKUs so of course a single base set of drivers will be shipped with the platform.

Intel's been shipping CDs with drivers for its boxed boards ever since I can remember.

OEMs want to be able to differentiate, tweak, preload thired party software so they can make extra revenue.

Please Tom (Hector). Start writing something that readers really care to read.

I am looking forward to a review of the new Penryn based MacBooks. I challenge you to write a real review. You probably won't because AMD's not inside.

Posted by: puhleeeeeease at March 16, 2008 09:28 AM

And if were a nice, neat, automatic little package to install windows with complete simplicity, we'd all have Bill Gates in 100% control of everything too. In fact it's already too much like that.

It would be generic and less modifiable as well. It would suck as much as a one piece, plastic Mac with everything all built into one. It would greatly appeal to the idiots out there. They could hire Mac's PR to do a "think differently" campaign with the new PC and all these new iTards would pop up out of now where.

The front of my PC would ask me for my credit card to give me permission to move my songs from my C: to my D: and pictures of Bill Gates shaking hands with Steve Jobs would pop up along with the Easter Bunny. NOooo!

Posted by: jz at March 19, 2008 11:23 PM

And if were a nice, neat, automatic little package to install windows with complete simplicity, we'd all have Bill Gates in 100% control of everything too. It would be generic and less modifiable as well. It would suck as much as a one piece, plastic Mac with everything all built into one.

It would greatly appeal to the idiots out there. They could hire Mac's PR to do a "think differently" campaign with the new PC and all these new iTards would pop up out of now where.


The front of my PC would ask me for my credit card to give me permission to move my songs from my C: to my D: and pictures of Bill Gates shaking hands with Steve Jobs would pop up along with the Easter Bunny. NOooo!

Posted by: jz at March 19, 2008 11:26 PM

Technology White Papers

 

InfoWorld Technology Marketplace

» Technology White Papers Library

Technology White Papers by Topic

Technology White Papers E-mail Alert

Find out when the latest white paper is available:
 
 
» BUY A LINK NOW

Sponsored Technology Links