- Innovation, regulation and research on tap at RSA 2008
- Researchers uncover 100 VoIP vulnerabilities
- Badware not pushing users offline
- Web attacks won't stop
- Most sites still hack-able
- Tips on employee monitoring
- Research: IT security maturing, but misaligned
- Clarke sharply criticizes Bush cyber-security plans
- Conference seeks to bridge risk, research
- Core finds new CEO
January 29, 2007 | Comments: (0)
The pain of Vista begins
![]()
Caught this McAfee anti-virus incompatibility entry over at Wired's Monkey Bites blog. Seems we're in for the long and normal path of most resistance as we slowly migrate over to the new OS.
While Bill wants to get 100 million people to move over to Vista by the end of the year (not impossible considering worldwide PC penetration). I know that I'm not going to be recommending it to businesses anytime soon. I'm going to be, as always, cautious.
And six different flavors of the new OS? Ugh, I see support headaches galore.
I do find it curious that Vista comes with Windows Defender to protect it against spyware and other potentially malicious software, but it doesn't come with integrated anti-virus. Which, I'm sure, will be leading to more of the pain alluded to above.
It's too bad that MS doesn't deal with AV vendors directly, embedding different flavors into the OS. You just choose during installation or first time use of the PC. That way businesses and consumers could step out of the way and just get systems to work (at least more so than they do now). Of course this happens with many systems now, but you only have one choice, the one the hardware vendor chose for you (if you're not using a predefined image).
The number one complaint I hear from people about personal AV software is how it seems to have issues with their OS. I guess that may just keep happening as we moving forward.
But I may just be having a pessimistic Monday.
Posted by Victor R. Garza on January 29, 2007 10:24 AM
RATE THIS ARTICLE:
-

- COMMENTS
It seems the absence of AV software in Vista could be attributed to the new Microsoft OneCare offering.
How ironic is it that they want us to pay them $49.95 a year to secure the OS that I could have just paid them up to $300. Who is guarding who here?
Posted by: Eric Q. at February 3, 2007 03:03 PM| ZERO DAY PODCAST |
| Listen to the latest podcast: |
MP3
•
•
•
Archive
•
|
TOP STORIES
Top 10 stories of the weekA new place to hide rootkits
Sun exec on OpenSolaris, Linux
AT&T: No free iPhone Wi-Fi info
MS to appeal E.U. fine
XP SP3 causes endless reboots
Vista as insecure as Win 2000
Google grilled on human rights
Java ubiquity an edge in RIA battle
The InfoWorld news quiz
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

- Virtualization: A Step by Step Approach to Success
- Dialing up Agility with Business Transformation
- 5 Things You Need to Know About Storage Virtualization

- Virtual Test Lab Automation: Manage development infrastructure
- Improve Resource Utilization and Lower Operating Costs
- Protect Your Data with SSL






![[VoiceIndigo Mobilize - Listen to podcasts on your mobile phone]](http://www.voiceindigo.com/ht/images/mobilize_logo_sm.gif)
